1. “Privacy breaches” continue

Yesterday, the Halifax Regional Centre for Education (what used to be called the school board) notified the public that it had experienced a “privacy breach” on its EXCEL registration system:

At 8 am today, registration opened for the 2018-19 school year for returning participants enrolled in the EXCEL program. This program provides before and after school care for elementary-aged children in 62 schools throughout the Halifax Regional Centre for Education (HRCE).

At 8:37 am, the system was shut down following concerns raised by users that they could see personal information of people who had completed their registration.

Approximately 3,200 parents/guardians would have received an access code to register this morning. Of those with access, 1091 completed their registration form, and 82 had started but did not finish.


CBC reporter Jean Laroche gave details:

Have just spoken to a parent who tried to register his children in HRM Excel when system crashed. When he refreshed screen – other family’s personal info came up. Children’s names, DOB, emergency contact info. So far complete silence from @nsgov which is now responsible. #nspoli

— Jean Laroche (@larochecbc) April 23, 2018

The McNeil government took over the school boards, so now the government owns all the headaches related to the boards. Before, the government could point fingers at (supposedly) incompetent boards; now all the screw-ups, school closings, and other school problems sit directly on the government’s lap. Be careful what you ask for.

Of course, the government has always been responsible for oversight (in both senses of the word) of the school websites; it just can’t now feign ignorance.

Relatedly, yesterday the province announced that Auditor General Michael Pickup will provide “audit assistance” into the non-breach of the Freedom of Information website. I guess that’s welcome, but maybe they should have paid more attention to Pickup’s November 2016 report that specifically warned there were security issues related to provincial websites.

Oh, also yesterday, I called out Robert Samuel, the province’s Chief Information Security Officer, for among other things conducting official provincial business via his LinkedIn account. Late in the day yesterday, Samuel took down his LinkedIn post, but of course I got a screenshot of it. Here it is:

2. Jamaican Cultural Association

“A Jamaican cultural group says comments made by a Progressive Conservative Party leadership candidate last week during a debate in the Nova Scotia Legislature on the legalization of marijuana have deeply wounded that community,” reports Sherri Borden Colley for the CBC:

“I would say … many people are very angry. I got so many phone calls asking me, ‘What are you going to do about this?’” said Olive Phillips, the president of the Jamaican Cultural Association of Nova Scotia. “Jamaicans are a very proud people.”

“Her statements were really disrespectful and not well thought out because her assumptions are generalizations which have no basis in fact,” said Phillips, who was born in Jamaica and came to Canada in 1968.

Phillips said when she read Smith-McCrossin’s comments she, too, felt immediate anger.

“But I also thought, ‘This is total ignorance.’ I grew up in Jamaica. I never saw the marijuana plant until I came to Alberta. That’s my first introduction to drugs, believe it or not, because the general populace did not use it.”

3. Northern Pulp Mill’s “sponsored content” in the Herald

Northern Pulp Mill. Photo: Halifax Examiner

The Chronicle Herald continues to publish advertising from Northern Pulp Mill — today in the form of “sponsored content” that has the same look and feel as adjoining news articles.

In this case, the “article” mis-contextualizes the mill’s impact on shipping through the Port of Halifax:

Northern Pulp and its parent company, Paper Excellence, is among the largest exporters out of the Port of Halifax, exporting more than 1,700 ocean freight containers every month through the port.

That at least is a fair number, but from there the piece brings in the completely irrelevant figures for the job impact of the total operations — including all the stuff that has nothing at all to do with Northern Pulp — of the Port of Halifax:

To accomplish this monumental feat, NPNS hires several freight companies that employ 30 full-time truck drivers every month, just to move NPNS’ volumes.

Each driver operates equipment with a capital purchase cost of $250,000 per unit, according to [NP PR rep Kathy] Cloutier. The port handles over 1,500 vessels every year and generates more than 12,400 jobs and $1.7-billion in economic impact, she says.

This is purposefully misleading the reader with a mishmash of numbers that have nothing to do with each other and which conflate Northern Pulp’s exports with the total port operations.

If it wasn’t an intentional bid at confusing the reader, I’d call it sloppy. Were I editing the piece, these are the notes I’d send back to the writer:

What does “employ 30 full-time truck drivers every month” mean? Are you implying that Northern Pulp hires 30 additional truck drivers with every passing month? Or are there just 30 drivers who have regular full-time jobs? Or is there very high driver turnover because the drivers are paid shit and treated like dirt so none of them stick around for more than a few weeks? I’m confused. Please re-word.

“Each driver operates equipment with a capital purchase cost of $250,000 per unit..” Does that mean that a truck costs $250,000? How is that relevant? Why are you bringing this into the analysis of the mill’s economic impact in Nova Scotia? Do they buy the trucks from Steele Auto? Are they manufactured in Burnside? I don’t get why the price of the trucks matter. 

“exporting more than 1,700 ocean freight containers every month through the port…. The port handles over 1,500 vessels every year and generates more than 12,400 jobs and $1.7-billion in economic impact” Wait. What? So NP moves 1,700 containers through the port a month, but what does that have to do with 1,500 vessels a year calling in Halifax? Are you implying that each ship that comes into the port is picking up only NP containers? This is a mess. The two don’t have anything to do with each other. How can you possibly imply that NP is responsible for $1.7 million in economic impact? That’s just a flat-out lie.

Are you taking bribes from Northern Pulp? Because that would totally violate the Halifax Examiner’s freelancer policies.

But of course, I’m not editing the piece, and no one at the Herald is editing it either.

It’s just advertising disguised as a news article. Worse, it’s purposefully misleading advertising. Honestly, I can’t even believe this passes muster with the Herald’s advertising standards.

4. Naming rights

The Dartmouth Sportsplex. Photo: Ben MacLeod / Wikipedia

I wrote about this yesterday, but it was buried in the government listings, so I’ll repeat myself here today:

Today, Halifax councillors will approve (there’s no doubt about this, because they can’t even understand the counter-argument) allowing the Dartmouth Sportsplex to sell naming rights to some usurious bank or price-fixing supermarket chain or conniving phone company or toxic waste spewer or some other dog-awful corporation. The staff report LIES! with the following justification:

The sale of external naming rights of publicly owned facilities is a practice which has been widely adopted to finance construction and/or maintenance of facilities, and is the subject of Administrative Order 56. HRM has pursued opportunities related to a few of its assets with the sale of naming rights for the BMO Centre in Bedford, Emera Oval and Molson Plaza; and, more recently, Scotiabank Centre and the Dartmouth 4- Pad. Regional Council also directed staff to explore opportunities for the Dartmouth Sportsplex (DSP) as part of the revitalization project. [emphasis added]

The Sportsplex renovation is costing the city — which is to say the public, which is to say you and me — $22 million; so unless Dog-Awful Corporation is ponying up $22 million, then anything it pays for naming rights is simply advertising on a public building, which you and I are subsidizing.

“Oh, but anything we can do to reduce government’s costs!” say unreflective people everywhere, not realizing that we could simply increase the commercial tax rate a few pennies and pay for all the rec centres needed without plastering Dog-Awful Corporation’s name onto our buildings and into our minds and common discourse.

Councillors and much of the public have been so indoctrinated into corporate framing that they can’t even conceive of a different understanding of naming rights. It’ll be the end of us.

To that, reader Patrick Casey adds:

Halifax: We’ll whore anything out for a buck or two. Literally.

Here’s how much the average HRM resident benefits from the naming game.

– Scotiabank: 650K/year, divided among 400,000 residents. $1.63 per.
– BMO: 0.13 per.
– Emera: 0.13 per.
– Molson: 0.10 per.

Making a grand total of…$1.99 per year, per resident.

Tax rates are a little more complicated than that — the bulk of municipal tax revenue is collected from businesses, not directly from residents — but Casey’s point is valid: we’re selling our municipal soul for peanuts. Less than peanuts, actually. Like for the salt that’s left over on the bottom of the peanut can.

Incidentally, I won’t be at today’s council meeting because I’m on an all-day reporting assignment. Besides the naming rights thing, council will also approve the Wanderers Ground stadium agreement with Sports Entertainment Atlantic and debate hurting Mark Lever’s fee-fees.

5. Living wage

The city continues to contract out services in order to avoid paying people doing needed city work a decent wage.

Today, the city has issued a tender for janitorial services of outside washrooms; click here to see the full list and expected cleaning schedules.

No matter who wins the contract, the costs for cleaning supplies and transportation are more or less fixed, while the only potential “savings” comes via wage reduction — likely, the firm that wins the contract will be the firm that pays the shittiest wages.

Contracting this work out necessarily condemns the workers to poverty wages. It is long past time for Halifax city council to adopt a living wage ordinance requiring that all companies doing work for the city pay their employees a living wage.

6. Afua Cooper

Afua Cooper. Photo: blackincanada.com

Afua Cooper has been named the city’s next Poet Laureate.




City council (Tuesday, 10am, City Hall) — see #4 above.


Community Design Advisory Committee (Wednesday, 11:30am, City Hall) — discussion of issues that appear to be related to the proposed Centre Plan, although the agenda doesn’t come right out and say that.

2720 Gottingen Street (left), with Elizabeth Pacey’s house next door. Photo: Google Street View

Heritage Advisory Committee (Wednesday, 3pm, City Hall) — Myles Baldwin, Shane Beehan, and Jillian Demmons want to open a restaurant and pub — they’re calling it the Narrows Public House — at 2720 Gottingen Street, which is a registered heritage property directly across the street from Stadacona. If approved, the pub will be on the first floor, with three apartments on the second. The owners have been renovating the property for some time (I’ve noticed their stone work out front).

The house itself is a registered historic property, but the staff report doesn’t give any details about its history. Staff says the proposal is “reasonably consistent” with heritage policies, and the recommendation is to have some limited constraints on the operation of the pub — closing at 11:30, and the like.

The house, however, is in a residential neighbourhood and directly next door to Elizabeth Pacey’s house, a “quite a bit older” heritage property. Pacey says the operation of a pub next door will make her house unrentable. Sandra Patterson, who owns the house on the other side of the property, is also opposed.

There was a public hearing last summer on the proposal, and it’s interesting to read the wide range of comments made (scroll to the end, here). Some neighbours are fully supportive, citing the already high transient population brought in by the Airbnb-ing of the neighbourhood; while others worry about additional delivery traffic, noise, and in Patterson’s words “bringing alcohol into the neighbourhood with a women’s shelter a few doors down.”



Human Resources (Tuesday, 10am, One Government Place) — a review of child care services and the Pre-Primary Program.


Public Accounts (Wednesday, 9am, Province House) — deputy Health minister Denise Perret and Health Authority CEO Janet Knox will be asked about the Mental Health Strategy.

On campus



Thesis Defence, Earth Science (Tuesday, 9:30am, Room 3107, Mona Campbell Building) — PhD candidate John Evangelatos will defend his thesis, “The Genesis and Evolution of Makarov Basin, Arctic Ocean.​”


Harmony and Hope, a Concert for Cancer Research (Wednesday, 7:30pm, Faith Tabernacle, Halifax) — featuring Erin Costello, Dalhousie Health Professions Chorale, and the Bedford Brass Quintet. Tickets are $20/$30; buy them here.

In the harbour

6am: Arsos, container ship, arrives at Pier 42 from Kingston, Jamaica
6:30am: Acadian, oil tanker, sails from Irving Oil for Saint John
9:30am: Don Juan, car carrier, moves from Pier 27 to Autoport
11:30am: Troms Sirius, fire fighting vessel, moves from Pier 9 to Bedford Basin
1pm: Interlink Levity, bulker, sails from anchorage to Sorel, Quebec
4pm: Fundy Rose, ferry, sails from Pier 9 for sea
8pm: Lundstrom Tide, supply vessel, sails from Pier 9 for sea
9:30pm: Arsos, container ship, sails from Pier 42 for Kingston, Jamaica


I don’t have a copyediter (see what I did there?) this morning; please be kind.

Tim Bousquet is the editor and publisher of the Halifax Examiner. Twitter @Tim_Bousquet Mastodon

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. So clicking on the link to read comments from the public hearing on the pub proposal brings up a 404 error. Funny how that often happens when such a link finds its way into a published news story.

  2. I am not sure how you find Isleville St directly behind 2720-30 Gottingen. You must be in a Phantom Tollbooth. I am surprised that the long standing residents of this neighbourhood would complain about a new pub when the North End Beverage Room was four doors down the street when they bought their houses. You buy a house next to a pig farm at a significant discount and then complain when a new pig farm is built after the first was burnt down. Apologies for the I, you,I, you paragraph structure I too am missing a copy editor. J

    1. Apparently she lives in Toronto, according to wiki : para 2 – ‘Cooper still lives in Toronto. She is a winner of the Harry Jerome Award for professional excellence’ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afua_Cooper

      ‘ This page was last edited on 14 March 2018, at 13:00.’

      Are there any men in HRM eligible for the position ?

  3. I wish HRM would promote the development of a community Pub network. These recreational facilities do a good job of bringing communities together and cost a lot less than community centres. I lived in England for a few months and frequented a local Pub almost every night. There were almost as many non-drinkers in the Pub as drinkers… it was more like a Tim Horton’s with a liquor license… it had the required dart boards and pool tables but some people were playing Bridge or just networking. I did not see any drinking to excess and the Pub closed for the night a midnight so there were no late night noise complaints that I was aware of. I do not remember any bands playing but there was a mostly unused Karaoke system onsite. I think a well regulated community Pub system would be a benefit to HRM.

    1. It would be nice, for sure. It’s one of the saddest things about suburbia; the need to drive everywhere (and zoning) killed the local watering hole.

  4. RE Heritage Advisory Committee:
    Isn’t it ironic. Some young people who have planned and worked for years on a project that will repurpose, restore and yes, save a beautiful heritage building and the NIMBY neighbours, Phil and Elizabeth Pacey want to stop them.
    Quite frankly, the Paceys, in their capacity as NS Heritage Trust leaders are as responsible as anyone for the development madness that is now our city. They became a laughing stock by promoting their obsession with views, and not saving heritage buildings and streetscapes. Halifax By Design was, in part, set up to cut down on their obstructionism. Hence, the nickname ‘View Police’. In some cases the views they were protecting didn’t even exist. When a related group (Friends of the Citadel, I believe) brought in an actual convention centre expert. his presentation was pretty much ignored because of who hired him.
    Another irony: I’m not sure if they have disclosed this, but I understand that they have plans to develop the land behind them on Isleville Street.
    I guess the final irony would be that they stop the pub application and some developer comes along, levels the building and builds another empty tower next door.

    1. Mr Parsons should get his facts right on this issue, starting with acknowledging the death of Phil Pacey last year.

    2. I would place the blame on the development community and their varied cronies and henchmen and councillors for the present mess.

      The Heritage Group was a convenient lighting rod and hobby horse for all those people who wanted unfettered development and had wanton disregard for this city’s heritage. They want unlimited access to power and money. Look at the Quinpool/Robie development as an example and look at the varied interests involved.

      In the face of that, Heritage groups are a fly in the ointment at best.

  5. The news should be more about facts than shaming, character assassination, finger pointing, laying blame and printing assumptions as if they are the undisputed factual truth. Sometimes it takes time to find the truth about an incident and it would be better to hold off on the sensationalism until a factual story can be written that is not filled with the rhetoric gleaned from other news media sources who likewise have embellished their assumptions because they have not done the research. Often when research has failed, assumptions prevail.

    The public reads the news and expects it to be truthful. If the “facts” are laid bare most of the public are capable of making their own assumptions without spin being added by the news media; especially the public that are willing to pay to read the news. The harm done when something is assumed can often not be undone. A couple of sentences in a one-time news apology, will never compare in its effect to the harm done by a week long rant in the news.

    The public demands that governments and companies be audited to find the unbiased truth… perhaps it is time for the same information quality standards to be applied to the news media. What do you think?

  6. I’m not sure that I agree with your tax math here, nor do I think that “a few pennies” on the property tax rate for businesses is a small thing. Even a penny on the rate is a big deal. Property tax rates for businesses are shocking and it is a wonder to me that any of the small ones manage to stay open at all.

    That said, I’m against corporate naming schemes. It is hokey and bush league, and yes, I think those European jerseys with an advertiser’s name emblazoned on the front are hokey and bush league too. Besides that, you are associating your public property with the company’s potential misdeeds or bad business practices. If they offered to pay to build the whole thing and contribute to the yearly operating costs, I’d probably be interested, but otherwise I’d as soon the building name wasn’t a billboard.

    I wouldn’t want my name on the building shown in that photo though. I’ve never seen it close up but from the photo here it looks like an old hog barn at a county fair ground.

  7. Thanks, the awarding of naming rights for facilities the community funds suggests strongly that money changes hands under the table instead of out in the open.

  8. To Ms Smith-McCrossin:

    Let them all pass all their dirty remarks
    There is one question I’d really love to ask
    Is there a place for the hopeless sinner
    Who has hurt all mankind just to save his own beliefs

    One love,
    One heart
    Let’s get together and feel alright.

  9. People who never go to pubs shouldn’t be allowed to comment on them. They have, by definition, no knowledge that is pertinent to the deliberations of a planning committee. The main impacts I have experienced from the proximity of 5 new places where food and drink are served near me is a decrease in the availability of street parking and a decrease in the petty crime and loitering while smoking dope that Tonys Donair used to attract.