1. Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles.
2. All commenters must use their first and last name.
3. Exceptions to policy #2 will be made on a case-by-case basis, at our discretion. Typically these exceptions are granted to protect the identity of the commenter for reasons that go beyond simply wanting to remain anonymous. For example, a government employee may want to make a comment on an article about his or her employer but fears retribution and possible job loss. Or, a person is being stalked on the internet, and full use of his or her name could present problems in that regard. While in such cases the Examiner may grant the use of anonymity or pseudonyms, we will do so only after we have ascertained the true full name of the commenter for our records.
4. All comments are held in moderation until approved. We want comments that are productive and extend the conversation, and will not tolerate or approve name-calling or disrespectful interaction between commenters.
5. We reserve the right to reject or pull down comments at anytime, without explanation.
If you subscribed with a pseudonym as your user name please append your first and last name when you comment; do that once and it will pop up automatically. Otherwise, we’ll be contacting you to ask for your name as part of the moderation process.
The commenting policy originally appeared in this post.
Hi Tim, I was looking for a contact number or email for general inquiries or comments that wouldn’t be associated with general comments. I cannot find contact information to contact the website and would like to. Am I missing something? Earl
tim@halifaxexaminer.ca
I am rural resident in Nova Scotia,and have been enjoying Mr. Beswick`s recent articles on life in rural NS. As a former HRM resident, I didn`t realize how metro-centred most news coverage usually is until I moved to the country but continue to listen to the daily commuting woes of HRM residents twice a day on the radio. Living in the country has opened my eyes to how lucky I am to not have to put up with city problems, but it has also given me a greater understanding of how tenuous the economy is in most rural areas. Mr. Beswick`s article took a risk giving voice to what seems to be a generally unpopular side of the Mill issue – i.e. the economic advantage of having an industry in NS that has also caused terrible environmental problems in the area. But it also gave me pause to try and understand how much more complex the situation is as it identifies an economic reality of providing good jobs that support many rural residents, apparently throughout both NS and NB. Surely we need to understand both sides of this story in order to move forward with solutions.
Good on you, Mr. Beswick.
One final comment, advertorial sections of the newspapers are on the rise and need to be better identified as such. I’ve gotten sucked into to a number of stories only to eventually realize that I`m reading a commercial. It is annoying and unnerving.
Re: Halifax’s “entire neighbourhood of streets named after murdering imperialist dudes” … I live on Hennessey Place and I’ve often wondered who the heck Hennessey was. After reading your sweeping proclamation, I got really curious and started asking neighbours. According to Bill up the street, Hennessey was a fireman who served at the time of the explosion. And my friend who lives on Merkel says, “Haha, I think Merkel is the name of the farmer who originally owned the land in the north end.” Can’t swear either is the final word, just passing on the local chatter….
I know it’s a small matter in the big schemes going on today, but both here in your paper and on radio yesterday, you made light of Halloween tampering. My son actually did get a fish hook in a small box of Smarties, years ago. I was with him as he dug in to eat some and yelped as he came out with the little fish hook dug into his finger. I immediately relayed this to the group he was out with (my husband was peace-keeping in Europe, so a friend had taken my kids out). It happened that three incidents had taken place that night in Halifax West (not Cole Harbour). Granted, this was a ages ago, but it did happen. Kids didn’t lie, nobody was mutilated for life, police checked a bit. A small bone to pick, sorry. Because I appreciate your honest accurate news reporting most of the time. Thanks..
So, if someone in dark clothing steps out at night with head down, reading a cell phone and wearing head phones crossing against a ‘Do not walk’ pedestrian sign, would we still count that as a “driver – pedestrian” collision ? The implication being that the driver would assume all the blame? Just asking.
So an engineering firm in Maine estimates the cost of renovating the Bar Harbour ferry terminal to be 5 million. That was several months ago. The NS Liberals are the funding partner and are responsible for the total cost. ( That’s us taxpayers by the way) Today, we learn the estimates are only 70% off! The actual cost is now estimated at 8.5 million. And the Liberal government has committed our taxpayer dollars to cover the full amount! Unbelievable- not with this government! And to add insult to injury, the minister of Infrastructure and Renewal, Lloyd Hines, insults taxpayers intelligence when he tells CBC news that the salaries paid to US Customs officials, paid once more by guess who? ( you and me ), is “proprietary” information. Well, it is NOT. Nova Scotians have a right to know how much of their tax dollar is funding this entire Yarmouth to Bar Harbour Bay Ferry. This is just another blatant example of the non accountability of this government when it comes to how it spends our tax dollars. Transparency? A joke. The Public Accounts Committee? A joke! And we have two years of this government remaining. It will only get worse!
Paul Fitzgerald
I’m confused. Doesn’t The Halifax Examiner stand for free speech. Shouldn’t we be defending the right to discuss the implications of ” mass migration ” and condemning those who want to supress the discussion? The movement of large numbers of displaced people could become a large issue in the future. There will be those who oppose it ( I guess we should at least discuss how many we could entertain )
Let’s not be afraid to discuss issues. Let’s not blindly label those who we don’t like or label as ” right wing extremists ” as not entitled to a different opinion. What are we afraid of?
Gary Ward
The right to free speech is not the right to used privatized platforms. I have people contact me all the time thinking I have some obligation to give them space for their pet project — their “raising money for X” scheme by pogo-sticking across Canada, the release of their new app, one guy thinks he’s truly the second coming of Christ, you name it. I’m under no obligation to give their speech my platform, nor to normalize what I think are crappy ideas by giving them the time of day.
The right to free speech merely means that *government* will not restrict speech. No one is prohibiting the anti-immigration people from starting their own newspapers or putting up their own billboards to say whatever they want. Even then, no one else is under any obligation to engage with them.
We should, as Canadians, for our own good, explore and confront the issues around immigration, which is going to become a larger issue in the future. That’s all I’m saying- there is a pro argument and an anti argument. The Halifax Examiner could facilitate the discussion as a public service.
Gary Ward