A green bin ready for pick-up in Halifax. Photo: Twitter/@hfxgov

The Halifax Examiner is providing all COVID-19 coverage for free.

Halifax councillors are looking at taking on more financial risk to offset a third of the cuts proposed to the city’s budget due to COVID-19.

Finance staff estimate the permanent impact of the pandemic on the municipality’s finances will be $85.4 million from lost revenue from things like transit fares. And the city will grapple with a cash-flow gap of up to $188 million from property taxes being paid late.

To offset the lost revenue, staff have rebuilt the budget with cuts to every department, resulting in reduced staffing in firefighting and policing, among other services.

During regional council’s budget committee meeting on Wednesday, the second day in a row, councillors approved a motion from Coun. Waye Mason requesting a staff report on reversing some of those cuts.

“It seems to me that there is a kind of general consensus among most councillors … to explore an alternative to what’s been proposed in terms of staffing, volunteer firefighter recognition, grants, and programs,” Mason said.

Mason’s motion proposes to reverse up to $33 million worth of proposed cuts to staffing through a hiring freeze and vacancy management (the practice of leaving vacant positions unfilled), a volunteer firefighter recognition program, grants, and other programs.

The Peninsula South Downtown councillor identified four potential funding sources.

The first is a reduction of up to $15 million in the debt charges budgeted to pay back the provincial government for the bridge loan it’s offering the municipality of up to $188 million. That loan has to be paid back at 1.1% interest within three years, and municipal staff recommended councillors budget $31.4 million for debt charges — which actually include interest and principal payment — this year.

The second source is the “conversion of capital from operating to debt by up to $20.5 million.” Mason is proposing to borrow up to $20.5 million to pay for capital projects like roads and buildings, rather than take that money from the operating budget. That’s because capital debt can be paid back over a longer period of time than the provincial loan, which can only be used to cover the cash-flow gap.

The third source of extra money is the city’s 2019-2020 budget surplus, which Chief financial officer Jane Fraser told councillors could total $35 million this year, more than double what was originally expected. That money would typically go into reserve accounts — like savings accounts, in household finance terms. Mason didn’t suggest an amount.

Fourth, the motion proposed to reduce the amount of money going into municipal reserves by up to $12 million. Those accounts were budgeted to grow by $22 million this year.

“Given the financial situation that we’re in and the cuts that we’re looking at, I question whether or not now is the time to be putting even more money into the rainy day fund when it feels like we’re already in a rainy day,” Mason said.

Mayor Mike Savage agreed with that point.

“If you’re saving them for a rainy day, if you look outside, it’s pouring right now,” Savage said.

“We haven’t had rain like this in my lifetime.”

Fraser said she’d bring the report back, as it’s ultimately council’s decision, but she warned the moves were riskier than her advice.

“A budget really is about risk. It’s about how much risk you want to take and what your year-end financial position is going to be,” she said.

Chief administrative officer Jacques Dubé warned that reducing the debt payments this year could result in the municipality taking on more debt in the future.

“Our advice is certainly not to reduce the payment on the short-term debt this year because you’ll be setting yourself up for failure in subsequent years,” Dube said. “But we can certainly take that back and consider that and give you our best professional advice, as usual, on that issue.”

Mason’s motion passed 14-2, with councillors Matt Whitman and Paul Russell voting no.

Whitman said he couldn’t support the motion because he supports the proposed cuts.

“Almost all of the cuts, I would say, were necessary,” he said. “The hiring freeze is necessary. The vacancy management work is necessary.”

The motion does not reverse the nearly 1,500 layoffs that have already happened.

Russell said the future is too uncertain for him to support Mason’s motion.

“It’s looking into a shaded crystal ball. We don’t know what it’s going to look like. So I want to be extremely careful with the expenses we have and make sure that we have the finances in order to be able to support those expenses,” he said.

“I’m not willing to entertain any additional debt and I’m not willing to entertain any lessening of the reserves that we have because we may need them later on.”

Summer ‘20 already stinks

Councillors also started to tackle the transportation and public works budget on Tuesday, and approved their first cuts of the COVID-19 budget season, agreeing to limit green cart collection to a biweekly schedule this summer.

In urban and some suburban parts of the municipality, trucks come to empty the green compost bins weekly during the summer months.

This summer, Haligonians will have to live with “the smell and the maggots,” as Coun. Russell Walker put it.

The change will save the city $1.15 million this year. The motion passed 13-2, with councillors Stephen Adams and Tim Outhit voting no.

Councillors will continue working on the transportation and public works budget during a special meeting added for Friday afternoon, and then move on to the Halifax Transit and planning and development budgets.

The budget is expected to be finalized by early June.


The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Some people have asked that we additionally allow for one-time donations from readers, so we’ve created that opportunity, via the PayPal button below. We also accept e-transfers, cheques, and donations with your credit card; please contact iris “at” halifaxexaminer “dot” ca for details.

Thank you!




Zane Woodford

Zane Woodford is the Halifax Examiner’s municipal reporter. He covers Halifax City Hall and contributes to our ongoing PRICED OUT housing series. Twitter @zwoodford

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
Cancel reply
  1. Is it true the HRM will cut weekly Green Cart pickup this summer? The HRM Councillor Waye Mason is in charge of rats for the city I read this last year, maybe before.. and was supposed to do something about the rats in the city well before the Covis. so we hope for a cool summer and live with the virus AND the rats? Is that Waye’s guidance?

  2. The HRM is not trying to save taxpayers any tax money. The HRM is trying to save city jobs,,,,jobs that the city doesn’t need anymore. If these HRM politicians can’t make the real tough decisions regarding massive staff layoffs for voters we should be looking for ways of removing HRM politician salaries.

    The Province needs to look at splitting up their forced HRM amalgamation just to save on the enormous cost to taxpayers of their HRM creature. Split up the HRM and we immediately put remaining staff at a lower pay level, most at the level of a small town. Tax funds must be spent in the area collected the Halifax County districts can’t rely on the commercial tax from the downtown. These funds belong to city taxpayers.

  3. Because when you are in a crisis that finds its nascence in zoonosis, the smartest thing to do is take steps to enable the proliferation of vermin.

    Why not, I don’t know, find that million dollars by giving the entire leadership team a significant haircut? What makes the public service leaders (not the very front lines) believe that they have any right to remain unaffected by this? I imagine we would get very different leadership and much more creative thinking if they had to actually be “all in this together” with those of us who pay their salaries. How unbearably ignorant and selfish to create more health hazards rather than make even a symbolic contribution.