One of REgroup’s garbage trucks. — Photo: Facebook/REgroup

Workers collecting solid waste in the Halifax area will have to wait five more years before they’re guaranteed a living wage for their work.

Halifax regional council voted unanimously to award eight contracts for solid waste collection to four contractors during its meeting on Tuesday. The contracts for collection of garbage, recycling, and compost cover the next five years, starting July 1, 2021. They’re worth a total of $75.9 million.

The contracts are divided into eight zones. Royal Environmental, better known as REgroup, will collect waste in five of the zones: Halifax; Dartmouth; Bedford and Hammonds Plains; Sackville, Beaver Bank, Fall River, and Waverley; and Cole Harbour, Eastern Passage, and Cow Bay. Green For Life Environmental (GFL) won the “Western County” zone. Miller Waste won the zone covering Porters Lake, Preston, and Chezzetcook. And Leo J Beazley won the zone covering the Eastern Shore and Musquodoboit Valley.

In October, council amended its social procurement policy to include a living wage requirement for contracts like this one. That will mean contractors have to pay their employees a living wage, as defined by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Currently, that wage is $21.80 per hour.

But the policy doesn’t come into effect until April 1, and the requests for proposals (RFPs) for these solid waste collection contracts are coming in before the new policy.

During Tuesday’s meeting, Coun. Cathy Deagle-Gammon asked whether the contractors have to pay a living wage under these new contracts.

Solid waste manager Andrew Philopoulos confirmed it’s not a requirement under these contracts because they were tendered and are being awarded before the new policy comes into effect.

“The living wage was not incorporated into this RFP,” Philopoulos said. The rollout for the living wage provision [is] April and we developed these procurement documents in parallel to the social procurement policy, and as such, it’s not been fully incorporated into these documents.”

Coun. Lindell Smith said, in hindsight, he would’ve asked for a review of upcoming contracts when council passed the living wage requirement.

“To me, it’s somewhat concerning when we’re so close to that April 1 mark that we don’t have that built in,” Smith said.

“It’s good to see that there’s diversity and inclusion training and whatnot, but I think as a city we are trying as best as we can to include the social impacts of everything that we do and this is an opportunity I think that we could’ve done it.”

Smith asked how long council could delay the award of these contracts. Philopoulos said the contracts needed to be awarded as soon as possible because some of the contractors would need to buy new vehicles.

“We really do need to get approval as soon as reasonably possible,” he said.

Smith asked whether council could postpone the approval and then factor in the living wage requirement in a new tender process.

“I don’t know how, legally, this would work, but my perfect world would be, we’d wait till April 1 and then include those social procurement pieces in it,” Smith said.

“But I’m assuming since the RFPs were already issued, there are probably some legal impacts of us to go and reissue those RFPs?”

“It was a comprehensive procurement process, right, so it’s not an easy thing at this point to go back and to implement a significant change,” Philopoulos said.

“I don’t believe, in the timelines that we have before us, that that is something we could accomplish.”

Smith said he’d appreciate more information from management on contracts coming up before April 1.

Councillors concerned about ‘oligopoly’ and ‘duopoly’ situations

Coun. David Hendsbee was concerned about awarding five of the eight contracts to REgroup.

“I always thought that we should try to have a level playing field as much as possible and have a fair and open competition,” Hendsbee said.

“Just having five to one company and one to each of the others, I think we’re starting to tip the scales back to more of an oligopoly situation.”

Coun. Waye Mason agreed, and said former chief administrative officer Richard Butts used to warn against awarding so many of the solid waste collection contracts to one company.

“The issue with giving more than three areas to one contractor, one supplier — it’s not about the service today, it’s that you’re building the army that will destroy you in five, or 10, or 15 years,” Mason said.

“You need to divide that up so that there’s always competition so that when you go to retender, you’re not in a position where people have started to sell their tiny piece of the business to the winner, or where you end up in a duopoly situation. I’m really uncomfortable with this.”

Mason moved to defer the discussion until the in camera portion of council’s meeting on Tuesday.

After just a few minutes in camera, council came out and voted unanimously in favour of the staff recommendation.


The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Some people have asked that we additionally allow for one-time donations from readers, so we’ve created that opportunity, via the PayPal button below. We also accept e-transfers, cheques, and donations with your credit card; please contact iris “at” halifaxexaminer “dot” ca for details.

Thank you!




Zane Woodford

Zane Woodford is the Halifax Examiner’s municipal reporter. He covers Halifax City Hall and contributes to our ongoing PRICED OUT housing series. Twitter @zwoodford

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
Cancel reply
  1. IMHO, those who sent out the RFPs knew that there was a living wage policy change coming as of April 1, so that should have been a requirement for the companies that received the RFPs. If a decision could have a smell, the stench of making those doing one of the dirtiest jobs around wait another five years to get a living wage would be worse than the stench that came off the green-bin-collecting-trucks this past summer.

  2. Not naive, but heretical. The state religion enjoins all votaries to contract out, privatize, deregulate, and generally enrich the system’s small minority of beneficiaries as much and as quickly as possible at the expense of everyone else, with the goal of further transferring wealth and political power to the top. The end result looks a lot like the death of democracy and the planet and the immiseration of billions, but market economists – the fanatical theologians of the current era – can explain how it’s all for the greater good.

  3. At the risk of sounding hopelessly naïve, why does the city contract out waste collection? Just buy some trucks, hire some employees, and do the work. That would ensure fair wages, and reduce costs due to efficiency (one service, no tenders) and no need for a corporation to make a profit. It’s not as if waste collection is a temporary service.

    1. The city used to do it, but of course the usual nonsense claims were made that the private sector could do it cheaper and so here we are. Look at the shiny aluminum wheels on those trucks; someone is making a bagful of money, just not the workers.

      1. They could do it cheaper because they could pay shit wages and not be held to account for it. Now we’ll be paying them a living wage, which we should always have been, and the financial incentive to go private is gone. We need to get this service back in-house.

        1. First line of the article states: “Workers collecting solid waste in the Halifax area will have to wait five more years before they’re guaranteed a living wage for their work.” So, unfortunately for all these workers, they won’t get a living wage until at least 2026 and the contracts remain private. As I say in my comment of yesterday, this stinks!