Photo: Joan Baxter

It has been about five weeks since the Nova Scotia massacre, five long weeks during which the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have cowered inside a cone of silence.

Compare its approach to how police forces around the world have typically handled similar events. From Paris to Toronto to just about Anywhere USA, the police are quick to inform the public about what has transpired and about key information about the perpetrator or perpetrators. Little, if anything, is hidden.

So what’s the problem here?

From the outset the RCMP right up to Commissioner Brenda Lucki seems determined to stall for time and control the narrative of this story. They have forced the media to go to court to find out what was in the applications for search warrants executed after the shootings. The law states that such information should be readily available to the public.

The Mounties have also taken refuge behind its claim that it has commissioned a psychological profile of the gunman and can’t say anything at this time. It kind of sounds like then candidate Donald Trump’s claim in 2016 that he couldn‘t reveal his tax filings because they were under audit.

In my long experience of writing about the RCMP, now into its fourth decade, I’ve become accustomed to the typical response I receive after something is published. Some are praiseworthy, many are castigating, including current and former members of the RCMP.

What I’ve learned and described is that RCMP culture is cult-like. There is an almost mindless commitment to the force. “There is no such thing as an ex-Mountie,” I once wrote, because even retired Mounties seem compelled to protect the image of the force.

Since publishing an opinion piece last week on, I’ve witnessed the typical gamut of comment. Among them, Philip Black wrote:

The RCMP are not perfect, but does that justify the rampant jumping to conclusions and the widespread RCMP bashing.

And Brenda Carr, a 911 dispatcher had this to say:

… people who do not work in this profession can only surmise what it is like and what it takes to do this job. And no one is looking for praise. And on the same note, no one is looking for criticism. They did their best. And you do not know nor will you ever know what these men and women did to stop this monster. This is a time for healing. This article is not helping, it is only hurting.

But to my surprise, many others have contacted me who don’t fit the normal profile in that a number of them were current or retired RCMP and other law enforcement officials.

“I’ve read everything you’ve written over the years and while I agreed with some of it, a lot of it just made me mad,” said one former high-ranking RCMP executive. “But now, I have to admit that I agree with you. The RCMP is broken. It’s not ready. It’s a danger to the public and its own members.”

That Mounties sentiments were echoed by another former Mountie, Calvin Lawrence, who first served in the Halifax police department before joining the RCMP, where he had a long career. He is the author of a book, Black Cop. He amplified the comment about readiness.

After the murder of three Mounties in Moncton in 2014, the RCMP changed its policies and all police officers were given long guns.

Lawrence says that while the Mounties carry the guns, they don’t likely know how to use them in a desperate situation. He says that while the RCMP talks a good game about its training, in reality a lot is left to be desired.

I suggested to him that the first Mounties to respond to the scene, particularly the supervisor, a corporal, may have been frozen in place, not knowing what action to take.

“That doesn’t surprise me at all,” Lawrence said. “You would think they had something in place to respond to crazies,” Lawrence said. “They probably put something in writing but didn’t practice it…. Tactical training costs money. The officers had the guns but didn’t know how to use them.”

But the most interesting call of all arrived with a cryptic description on the cell phone call display that I had never seen before.

The caller, who could best be described as a Deep Throat whistleblower, was obviously nervous. I will call him “he” from now on because there are more hes than shes in the law enforcement world.

“This is the first time I’ve ever done something like this,” he said. “But I felt I have to do something.”

He said he was calling me to encourage the media to keep asking questions: “Don’t give up.”

When I told him that I and others who are pursuing the story have a thousand questions about what went wrong, from the indecision at Portapique Beach Road, the apparent communications debacle where not only the RCMP brass was not alerted to the seriousness of the situation but also the public.

I asked him why the premier of Nova Scotia and the province’s Attorney General were reluctant to call a public inquiry.

“Is it because Premier McNeil has relatives in policing, that the Attorney General is an ex-RCMP and that there are ex-RCMP in the police services branch?”

“That’s not it,” he said. “It’s about the money.”

So I switched to events.

“Why was Heidi Stevenson alone in her car?”

“I know what happened to Heidi,” he said. “It was just bad luck. But, you’re right, she shouldn’t have been there.”

But that wasn’t why he called.

“All that stuff will eventually come out,” he said.

The real issue, he said, was what the police are hiding about their previous knowledge about the gunman.

“Make requests about Wortman and what the police knew about him.”

“RCMP or Halifax?”

“Just keep asking questions and filing access requests.”

I tried to push him. I pointed out that while the COVID-19 epidemic has hampered the news gathering abilities of the major media, there was a lot of good work being done by an array of organizations from the on-line Halifax Examiner to Canadian Press and even the notorious Frank Magazine. To date the various entities have reported on everything from the gunman’s quirks, threats to others, illegal guns, replica Mountie cars, possible cigarette smuggling and even the murder of someone in the United States, among other things. The man killed 22 people, including a police officer in cold blood, so he doesn’t have a reputation to besmirch. In the absence of the RCMP’s official story about him, speculation becomes rampant.

“It seemed to me from the outset that he may have killed other people in the past,” I said.

The whistleblower just hmmmed.

“There’s something they are hiding that will blow the lid right off this thing,” the whistleblower reiterated. “I can’t tell you what it is. I shouldn’t even be telling you this. Just keep pushing.”

When I ran all this by Maclean’s writer Stephen Maher, he immediately added another possibility. “Maybe he was a CI.”

A confidential informant? With a licence to kill?

It’s a crazy idea but in the absence of facts from the RCMP people will talk.

That’s the situation we are in.

This week the RCMP and its government lawyers have continued to obstruct the information process, insisting upon redacting information contained in the applications for its search warrants.

And then there is the psychological assessment or “autopsy” of the gunman. Well here’s my independent analysis.

He likely wet the bed when he was young. He had a fascination with fire. He tortured little animals. He likely had an accident and sustained a seemingly minor head injury in his youth. He suffered from undetected frontal lobe brain damage. He had low self-esteem but masked that with a superficial outward face. He grew into a malignant narcissist. Like many serial killers and mass murderers, he had a fascination with policing but becoming a security guard was beneath his station. He was a misogynist, largely because he had sexual orientation issues. He had no empathy for anyone and was controlling. I could go on, but….

That’s it. Send the cheque to a charity of your choice.

That being done, Commissioner Lucki, what’s the BIG SECRET?

Paul Palango is a former senior editor at the Globe and Mail and author of three books on the RCMP. He lives in Chester Basin.

The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Some people have asked that we additionally allow for one-time donations from readers, so we’ve created that opportunity, via the PayPal button below. We also accept e-transfers, cheques, and donations with your credit card; please contact iris “at” halifaxexaminer “dot” ca for details.

Thank you!

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. Wetting the bed as a child, though? C’mon, lots of kids do this for psychological or physical reasons and it’s not really cool to link that to someone’s definition of a psychopath or sociopath.

    1. You can look it all up. It wasn’t intended to be offensive to any individual and certainly not all who display any of those traits evolve that way, thank the heavens. But some do, along with many other characteristics they pick up along the way in the great nature vs nurture continuum. It is what it is.

  2. Reputation VS Character… All policing bodies in Nova Scotia have difficulty between the two… The RCMP and HRP both have lost the respect of the citizens they serve because of the lack of accountability, zero transparency and no real rapport with anyone…

  3. I’d like to reply to a few comments raised on this issue. First to the obviously esteemed former member of the RCMP, Calvin Lawrence, who would have, by my estimates, retired in approximately 2003. I can assure you, Calvin, as a member who served when you were in the force and still serves today, that the training related to active shooters is 200% greater than it was in your day. For you to sit there in your rocking chair and cast judgement on the members who responded to this tragedy, which is unprecedented in virtually North America, let alone Canada, is incredible to me. As a former member, you should be supportive to your fellow members, instead, you for some unknown reason, feel the need to say that “although members carry guns, they likely don’t know how to use them in a desperate situation. What factuality is this statement based on? Nothing of course. You continue to blabble your bs, by saying that we should “have a way to deal with crazies.” Well we do now have yearly active shooter training, unlike in your day, when that was unheard of. You wouldn’t have had a clue how to deal with a lunatic like this, because, quite clearly, when you were a member, this training didn’t exist. I know, because I was there back then. So to make myself clear, shut your mouth, because you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.

    1. Thank you for proving my point about the cult-like attitude of the RCMP. You said: “As a former member, you should be supportive to your fellow members…”
      “So to make myself clear, shut your mouth.” That’s old-school, closed-rank RCMP bullying at his finest. Thank you for the demonstration.
      Mr. Lawrence has many policing credentials beyond his stint in the RCMP, including training. His comments to me were supported by others.
      In lambasting him, Mr. Bryce, you seem to have overlooked the shooting up of the Onslow fire hall by a Mountie or two. Tell us more about the training, please.

    1. I will do my best but I am confident that other journalists and their fellow citizens are pushing on all fronts and I encourage their success. On the flip side, hopefully the RCMP diehards wake up and recognize that this latest incident is a clear signal that the RCMP is in distress and not just something else to be swept under the rug.

  4. The RCMP is a corps of mostly well intentioned men and women working for a sociopathic organization. This has been clear since the report of the MacDonald commission in the 1980s. This is the big secret.

    1. You are dead on. The McDonald Commission is the root of all evil when it comes to what has happened to the RCMP. The subsequent politicization has helped to create the chaos that is considered normal today. Good for you Bill. You get a gold star from the history teacher, but not spelling … I believe it’s McDonald.

  5. Gina : If GW did anything weird in his childhood or high school years he concealed exceedingly well. But a good place to start would be at UNB, where he was voted weirdo of the year, awarded the CHUCK COSBY award by his dorm mates. Even though he was an adult, he had gathered a pile of false IDS and false names and used them when he mysteriously disappear for days, never explaining to his room mate where he had gone. People found him kinky, an exhibitionist, quick to take offence, always making mountains out of molehills, strange, odd.

    1. To me he is a garden variety psychopath/sociopath. I’ll leave that up to others. The other story is about the RCMP. That’s my focus. Maybe we should do a psychological profile of the Mounties. Is there a doctor in the house?

  6. “The whistleblower just hmmmed.”
    What kind of a hmmmed was it? An agreeing one or a not that but something else one?
    Seems we should be digging deeper into his child/youth/young adult life.

    1. Gina: the source was inscrutable. I sensed it could be true, he had killed before. However, the source was determined to get to the major point… Wortmans relationship to the police. The source might have been a great actor, but in my experience, was being truthful. The focus was on that one that one explosive thing. I did the story now because I thought it was important to find the truth. I want everyone or anyone to get the so-called scoop. I really am sanguine about who wins, just that we the public win. I thank Tim for recognizing the relevance and acting with expedience. Thank you, Paulp