1. Carbon tax
This item is written by Jennifer Henderson.
The federal government has rejected an 11th hour request from Premier Tim Houston to extend today’s deadline for submitting alternative proposals to the federal carbon tax, expected to take effect in Nova Scotia this January.
Houston signed the letter as chair of the Council of Atlantic Premiers and also asked for a meeting with Environment and Climate Change Canada Minister Steven Guilbeault so the four provinces could discuss “practical solutions” to deal with rising prices for home heating oil.
The letter reads:
We are deeply concerned about the affordability impacts of carbon pricing on households in our region, especially as almost 40 per cent of Atlantic Canadians experience energy poverty — by far the highest rate in the country,” reads Houston’s letter. “The increase to the costs of energy under the carbon price will amplify the inflationary pressures currently being felt in Atlantic Canada and we believe that any discussion on carbon pricing should prioritize mitigating these impacts.
We would like to request a meeting with you and your officials to identify practical solutions to this issue, especially as they relate to home heating fuels, before our provinces formally submit our plans. As such, we are requesting a short-term extension for the provincial carbon pricing plan submissions. This would allow us to resolve any remaining issues, engage in meaningful conversations on solutions for heating fuels and to discuss options for the federal government to support energy affordability in the region.
The letter makes no mention of the price of gasoline, which is expected to spike 14 cents a litre in Nova Scotia next January, and which Premier Houston has mentioned in almost every conversation about the carbon tax. This may be because other Atlantic provinces, which have already been collecting the tax, will see a much more gradual rise at the pumps.
Yesterday’s letter is a follow-up to a proposal Houston submitted two weeks ago, which argued Nova Scotians should continue to be exempt from paying carbon tax because this province has the strictest legislation in the country, requiring Nova Scotia Power and other polluters to cut carbon emissions farther and faster than the benchmarks set by Ottawa. Nova Scotians are already paying to cut carbon emissions through rising power rates to transition off coal and on to renewable sources of energy.
“We had hoped that the federal government would be open to our plan — a plan that is better than a carbon tax for Nova Scotia. They were not”, said Nova Scotia environment minister Tim Halman, who also issued a written statement yesterday.
That argument worked four years ago, when the province introduced a cap-and-trade system similar to Quebec’s, where emissions by large companies were “capped” at a certain level and they could pay to purchase carbon “credits” if they exceeded their limit. But with the price of carbon rising from $50 a tonne to $170 a tonne by 2030, cap-and-trade is no longer sustainable among a small number of participants. The Houston government is scrapping the program by end of 2023 but has yet to set a price on carbon as required by federal legislation.
In his reply to the Houston yesterday, federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault was clear about why the federal government continues to reject Nova Scotia’s alternative and why he will not grant an extension to the Sept. 2 deadline. Here is part of the text from Guilbeault’s letter:
Atlantic provinces, like all other provinces and territories, have had a year to prepare their submissions. The deadlines were clearly and repeatedly communicated and are based on the legal requirements to update the national pollution pricing system at regular, predictable intervals. I am therefore continuing to request that provinces submit their plans by the September 2nd deadline, while committing to work with Atlantic Provinces over the next two weeks to identify practical programming solutions on the specific home heating concerns that they have raised.
I want to be very clear about the importance of pollution pricing in making life more affordable for families. Provinces have every opportunity to design systems that support families by returning revenues back to people. For our part, the federal system already in place in some provinces is returning rebate cheques four times a year totaling between almost $800 to $1100 for the average family of four, with eight out of ten getting more back than they pay.
I remain committed to working in a collaborative, productive way with provincial counterparts to fight climate change while making life more affordable for Canadian families.
While that last line reads like typical boilerplate and might be viewed as simply slapping lipstick on a pig, it does express a willingness to keep the political conversation going about how to find some “practical solutions” to help people deal with energy costs likely to escalate rapidly.
Tim Bousquet comments:
We’ll see how this plays out. I think on paper there’s much ado about not much — people on the lower end of the income spectrum will in the end receive more money than they pay out in increased energy prices, people on the higher end of the spectrum will be able to absorb it, and the price cues will have some effect. Industry will pass the increased costs on to consumers who get the rebate, but the gradual nature of the increasing tax will shift the overall economy in the desired direction (it would’ve been better for everyone, including industry, had the tax begun two decades ago, but here were are).
That’s on paper. In the real world, I have concerns. I like the redistributive aspect of the carbon tax program, but I don’t think people in power, or of the managerial class, or media commentators quite understand the day-to-day financial reality of poverty.
A rebate cheque received this morning is spent this afternoon on past due bills and needed supplies. The money is not held back in reserve until next month or the following month to be applied to the cost of filling the tank. At 14 cents a litre, that’s probably not a giant concern (it’s well within the normal price fluctuation), but as the tax increases, perhaps the rebate should become monthly.
2. Five new COVID deaths
Nova Scotia is reporting five new deaths from COVID, for the most recent reporting period, August 23-29. In total, 497 people in Nova Scotia have died from COVID through the pandemic, 385 of whom are considered Omicron deaths.
Additionally, 38 people were hospitalized during the reporting period because of COVID, up from 34 the previous reporting period.
Nova Scotia Health reports the current (as of yesterday) COVID hospitalization data:
• in hospital for COVID-19: 48 (7 of whom are in ICU)
• in hospital for something else but have COVID-19: 146
• in hospital who contracted COVID-19 after admission to hospital: 135
The above figures do not include any (if any) children hospitalized at the IWK.
Also, for the same reporting period, there were 1,310 lab-confirmed (PCR tests) new cases, the lowest weekly count this calendar year. However, PCR testing is a weak metric, as it is not widely available, and many people don’t bother to get a PCR test. The graph above does not reflect people who test positive only with a rapid take-home test or who don’t test at all.
3. SiRT charges RCMP officer
A news release from the Serious Incident Response Team (SiRT, the body that investigates violent and other “serious” incidents involving police):
On February 21, 2022, SiRT was contacted by the RCMP after receiving a complaint of an alleged assault that had occurred earlier that day.
After investigating the matter, one charge of assault and one charge of choking were laid against Cpl. Mark Kellock, a member of the RCMP Northeast Nova District. He will appear in Pictou Provincial Court on September 26, 2022, at 9:30 a.m.
The Northeast district covers everything from Amherst to Sydney. According to his LinkedIn profile, Kellock started his career with the Stellarton Police as a part-time officer in 1990, then was hired by the RCMP in 1993. He was assigned to Victoria until 1999, when he was transferred back to Nova Scotia. He’s worked in the Pictou-Stellarton area since 2010.
After the charges against Kellock were announced, Inspector Matco Sirotic, Northeast Nova District Policing Officer issued the following statement:
On February 21, 2022, the Pictou County District RCMP became aware of an on-duty excessive use of force allegation made against Cpl. Mark Kellock, who’s posted to Pictou County District. The matter was immediately referred to the Nova Scotia Serious Incident Response Team (SiRT), which completed an independent investigation.
On August 31, SiRT charged Cpl. Kellock with Assault under Section 266 of the Criminal Code and Choking under Section 267(c) of the Criminal Code. He’s scheduled to attend Pictou Provincial Court on September 26, 2022.
These criminal charges are alarming and we take these incidents seriously. Cpl. Kellock, who’s been an RCMP member for 29 years, is currently on administrative duties. His duty status is under review pending an internal code of conduct investigation and the court process.
4. Race-based data for police stops
The province has agreed to mandate that police collect race data for all police stops.
The recommendation for the collection of such data came first from the Wortley Report, which analyzed the data about street checks collected by Halifax police, and secondly by the Bryan Report, which provided more detailed suggestions about how to go about doing so.
Specifically, the Bryan Report defines “police stops” as follows:
• police traffic stops;
• stops of citizens on foot when the police have reasonable suspicion to stop the individual;
• incidents involving use of force by police.
The collection of race-based data will be required of all police agencies in the province. To begin, the race of the person stopped will be based on “officer perceptions,” but as the policy is developed, it will include racial self-identification.
Besides the racial data, the recommendations also include that other information about the stop be included: “the date of the stop, the time of the stop, the location of the stop, the reason for the stop, the outcome of the stop, and whether the person or vehicle was searched by the police.”
Yesterday’s press release announcing the policy does not include a timeline for implementation.
5. Space port
I could write a whole thing about it (I’d rather not), but a construction permit does not equal a space port. That’s just dumb.
A space port needs: a business model, investors, rockets, and contracts. The current proposal has a murky business model, investors fleeing out the door, a rocket factory being bombed by the Russians, and no contracts at all.
On August 17, a pilot reported a skunk running around the runway at Halifax International, but a ground search couldn’t find it. Two days later, on August 19 just after 7pm, another pilot reported either the same skunk or another one on the runway but, alas, it was deceased. Two other planes were delayed for departure for about five minutes while the carcass was removed.
Then, an hour later, an Air Canada flight from Montreal to Frankfurt, Germany reported an unruly passenger, and diverted to Halifax. The report doesn’t say what happened with the passenger — presumably he (it’s always a he) was arrested, but there’s no police release about the arrest. The plane didn’t need to dump its fuel, and no emergency was declared.
Reporters are people too
I started the Halifax Examiner eight years ago. The last two and a half have been especially, well, event-filled.
I don’t know if it’s been because the world essentially broke, or it’s just I’m getting old, or if it’s the reporting on COVID and the mass murders specifically, but I increasingly find myself exhausted to the point of being annoyed. I can’t keep up, I don’t read emails, I don’t participate in the ways I should.
I try to take time for myself — I’ve been much better about staying off social media on weekends — but the work continues.
For example, this week I’m supposedly on “semi-vacation,” but I worked about 20 hours Monday and Tuesday on the Susie Butlin article, and wrote up the above COVID report yesterday, plus did various editing chores through the week. This truly is a step-down from my usual work life, but it’s not enough.
Thankfully, Iris has been taking care of the business side of things, Suzanne the editorial side, and the other writers don’t need my day-to-day direction to do spectacular work. The entire crew is fabulous, and I value them more than I can say.
Still, I’m learning that to be most useful to this operation, I need to take more time for myself, assign more stories out rather than report them myself, and to do a bit more work that I find personally interesting, rather than perfunctory.
There are a couple of projects on the horizon that I’m super excited about, and I think getting into those will bring me out of my general bad attitude. Readers have understood that these projects take time, but I assure you, they’ll be worth the wait.
So to these ends, a couple of small announcements: It’s taken longer than I would have hoped, but we’re not far away from launching a new website, possibly by the end of the month. The appearance of the site won’t change greatly, but it will be easier to navigate, and will be especially friendly on the subscribing side of things. Don’t worry: still no ads or pop-ups, and we’re not selling your info.
With the new site will come a small increase in subscription rates, the first in eight years. The increase will allow us to give everyone a well-deserved pay raise, and free up some of my time, both for my peace of mind and to pursue the projects I have in mind. I’ll have details about rates and so forth once we work through them.
It’s a growing stage for the Examiner, as we become a more, er, sustainable operation. I very much want the Examiner to not be solely about me, and when the time comes (hopefully many years from now), to live on without me.
Oh, I don’t push subscriptions enough; if you’d like to support the Examiner, you can do so here.
Thanks for hearing me out.
Danny Deraney, who is one of those people who only posts “fun” videos on Twitter, posted this one:
Always remember to tip your server.
🎥 Imgur pic.twitter.com/p5H382eveA
— Danny Deraney (@DannyDeraney) August 31, 2022
It’s neither here nor there, but I recognized the place — I was there just two weeks ago. It’s Las Mañanitas in Brewster, New York (“The Mornings,” but I’m always there in las tardes). The restaurant has become a stopping point on my trips south.
It has better-than-average Mexican food — have I mentioned that the one drawback to living in Nova Scotia is the lack of good Mexican food? Don’t @ me — you don’t know what you’re talking about until you’ve visited The Mission district in San Francisco, which has the best Mexican food on the planet, even better than in Mexico itself.
Anyway, Las Mañanitas overlooks a reservoir, and is a good place to relax after a long day’s drive, with a hotel to crash at next door.
Once when I was there, there was a wedding reception out on the lawn area, just like in the video; who knows? it might’ve been the same wedding.
Tip your server.
In the harbour
05:00: CMA CGM Corte Real, container ship (150,269 tonnes), sails from Pier 41 for New York
06:00: Atlantic Sea, ro-ro container, arrives at Fairview Cove from Liverpool, England
06:00: ZIM Qingdao, container ship, arrives at Pier 42 from Valencia, Spain
06:00: Oceanex Sanderling, ro-ro container, moves from anchorage to Pier 41
07:00: NYK Demeter, container ship, sails from Fairview Cove for Southampton, England
08:00: Celebrity Summit, cruise ship with up to 2,100 passengers, arrives at Pier 20 from Bar Harbor, on an 11-day roundtrip cruise out of Boston
08:30; Norwegian Breakaway, cruise ship with up to 4,819 passengers, arrives at Pier 22 from Saint John, on a seven-day roundtrip cruise out of New York
08:30: Banglar Agrajatra, oil tanker, arrives at Irving Oil from IJmuiden, Netherlands
16:30: Celebrity Summit sails for Sydney
06:00: ZIM Qingdao sails for New York
17:00: Atlantic Sea sails for Baltimore
18:00: Oceanex Sanderling, ro-ro sails for St. John’s
19:30: Norwegian Breakaway sails for New York
Cruise ship this weekend: Norwegian Pearl (up to 2,873 passengers) on Sunday.
06:00: Sonangol Namibe, oil tanker, sails from Point Tupper for sea
07:00: Phoenix Admiral, oil tanker, arrives at Point Tupper from New York
Long weekend! I’m travelling all weekend, and Stephen Kimber is taking this week off. There might be a couple of articles later today, but unless the sky falls (entirely possible), the Examiner will be in hiatus, mostly. Get out and enjoy the sun. See you Tuesday.
Subscribe to the Halifax Examiner
We have many other subscription options available, or drop us a donation. Thanks!
I know that video is supposed to be amusing, and yes, that server is carrying a significant amount. If you have ever worked a banquet floor, you will notice that this is not such an unusual feat. Banquet servers are the least appreciated and most abused/overworked members of the f&b service brigade. Yes, tip your server – even better encourage your food service employers to pay better wages with commensurate respect.
Folks who worry about the impact of carbon taxes on the poor seem to forget than many poor folks don’t have cars, or if they do, the costs of maintenance, repairs, and insurance are all significant burdens. The solution isn’t avoiding taxes on gas, but ensuring decent public transit is available, in cities and rural areas. Similarly, if they are renting, as many poor folks do, they are either not paying utilities or likely paying utilities in a poorly insulated building which they cannot upgrade. The solution isn’t avoiding taxes on utilities, but capping rent increases (to force landlords to upgrade if utilities are included) and ensuring apartment buildings meet energy standards.
In other words, if Houston et al are worried about the poor, instead of using them as an excuse to avoid carbon taxes, do something to reduce their burdens such as investing in transit and better housing.
Houston says: “We are deeply concerned about the affordability impacts of carbon pricing on households in our region, especially as almost 40 per cent of Atlantic Canadians experience energy poverty — by far the highest rate in the country,” reads Houston’s letter. “The increase to the costs of energy under the carbon price will amplify the inflationary pressures currently being felt in Atlantic Canada and we believe that any discussion on carbon pricing should prioritize mitigating these impacts.”
As if the fact that the planet is burning and drowning at the same thanks to fossil fuels will not have an “impact” on Nova Scotians. If he is so concerned about the cost of energy he could start by re-nationalizing NSPI, stop promoting and subsidizing the fossil fuel industry, support green sources of energy, and support public transport rather than constantly twinning highways
Of course, the federal government is equally hypocritical but still it’s good to see them not caving to this particular political lobbyist for fossil fuel company profits.
Could Nova Scotia possibly afford to ‘nationalize’ NSPI?
If we did, could we afford the maintenance and upgrade costs a large utility always needs?
I’d like to imagine this could be done but as I recall when it was publicly owned, maintenance was said to have been deferred for years requiring urgent, huge investment had we kept it public.
Could we manage it as well or better than the private sector at less cost since we don’t have to pay investor dividends? That sounds plausible until you see how well we have manged public health care (admittedly complicated by the reduced funding from the Feds).
“Could Nova Scotia possibly afford to ‘nationalize’ NSPI?
If we did, could we afford the maintenance and upgrade costs a large utility always needs?”
Has Nova Scotia Power done anything for the maintenance or upgrade costs or has it just looked to increase shareholder dividends.
A public owned utility run by ethical and public minded people will trump private sector self interest every time.
Mr Houston’s shell company accountancy and nepotism has amply displayed where his allegiance lies.
” …returning rebate cheques four times a year totaling between almost $800 to $1100 for the average family of four, with eight out of ten getting more back than they pay.”
A family of four does not need a government that takes money from them and then returns the money 3 months later. He does not mention a family of a single mother and 2 kids living an hour away from where she works. He does not care about the 20% of families who will be out of pocket. He does not care about families living from pay cheque to pay cheque.