1. Carbon plan

“Nova Scotians will pay more for electricity, gasoline, and home-heating  over the next four years as part of the province’s plan to reduce its carbon footprint and avoid a carbon tax Ottawa announced it will impose on four other provinces beginning this January,” reports Jennifer Henderson. “But Premier Stephen McNeil insists Nova Scotia consumers will pay much less under a homegrown cap-and-trade program which Ottawa has approved in lieu of collecting a carbon tax.”

Henderson gets into the complexity of the plan, but then notes that it doesn’t account for greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from a LNG plant proposed for the Canso Strait area. If the plant moves forward, it won’t be in operation until after the carbon plan announced yesterday expires, but that just demonstrates that yesterday’s plan is just a stop-gap measure and not really a long-term solution to seriously reducing GHG into the future.

My opinion is that that a simple, straight-forward carbon tax should be applied, and the proceeds distributed directly back to the people in the form of an annual cheque. Once people understand that the carbon tax gets reflected back into their own wallets, then there will be the political will to ratchet up the tax over time.

Anyway, click here to read “Stephen McNeil announces his complicated carbon plan.”

This article is for subscribers. Click here to subscribe.

2. Kitch and D’Arcy charged

Tracey Kitch. Photo: Career Women Interaction

“Halifax Regional Police have charged former IWK Health Centre CEO Tracy Kitch with fraud over $5,000 and breach of trust in the wake of the expense scandal that rocked the Halifax children’s hospital last year,” reports the CBC:

Police have also charged former IWK chief financial officer Stephen D’Arcy with breach of trust, unauthorized use of computer and mischief to data.

In June 2017, a CBC News investigation found Kitch had used a corporate credit card for a variety of personal charges. At the time, Kitch and other officials, including D’Arcy, called the errors unintended and said everything had been repaid.

But an independent financial investigation by accounting firm Grant Thornton found that was not the case.

The report, released Aug. 31, 2017, showed Kitch billed $47,000 in expenses deemed to be personal during her time as CEO.

Those expenses included $26,000 for air travel, $4,600 for overusing data on her mobile device, $4,400 for taxis, $2,600 for relocation costs, $1,900 for car rentals and $1,500 for hotel and related costs. The personal expenses date from October 2014 until June 30, 2017.

The audit, police investigation, and charges spring from the work of reporter Michael Gorman, who revealed the expense problems last summer. Yesterday, Gorman pointed out that he was made aware of the issue by an anonymous tip:

This 100% The initial digging never would have happened without an anonymous phone call. To this day I don’t know who it was.

— michael gorman (@MichaelTGorman) October 23, 2018

Most of my own investigations start with someone out there in the public being bothered about something. For instance, I had a conversation with someone Monday who said they’d been sitting on the fence about contacting me for months. As I always do in such situations, I assured them that I would not reveal their name unless and until they wanted it revealed; I’m not in the business of causing people trouble they don’t deserve, and I’ll never burn a confidential source. I got enough information from our conversation to start on a paperwork dig that will likely result in a story.

The point is that you out there in the public know best what wrongs are being committed, and you have the power to tell somebody about it. Often that somebody can be a reporter, and sometimes the reporter can get results, as did Gorman.

3. Innovation is getting old

Photo: Halifax Examiner

Yesterday, Nova Scotia Business Inc. (NSBI) announced it is granting Michelin potential payroll rebates of $3,569,500. The grant falls under something called the “Innovation Rebate Program,” which the announcement tells us “provides financial incentives on projects that enable a company to increase innovation capacity through private-sector capital investments or adoption of new technologies and business processes.” The rebate covers a quarter of project costs, and the projects must be valued at between $2 million and $15 million; I guess a new laptop for Halifax Examiner, Inc. is out of the question.

In Michelin’s case, the project is described as “an innovative semi-finished manufacturing process.”

Can I just point something out here? All of this — the Innovation Rebate Program, the justification for it, and the labeling of Michelin’s equipment buy as “innovative” — is complete and utter bullshit. Let’s be frank: this is a corporate subsidy wrapped with the bullshit moniker “innovation” in order to sell it to the public.

Every business, every charity, every university department, every government office, every school sports program, every whatever, is forever on the lookout for new equipment and processes that will make whatever the organization does work more efficiently. That’s been the nature of human endeavour for eight thousand years or so. The newest app or software program or innovative semi-finished manufacturing process is not a difference in kind or some sort of magic, it’s just organizations doing business.

Earlier in the day, NSBI announced potential payroll rebates of $9,877,500 for Manulife, which, the announcement tells us, “is transforming its business to become a digital, customer-centric market leader.” Surprisingly, that isn’t described as “innovative,” I guess because it doesn’t involve the purchase of equipment that can be further subsidized.

Maybe “innovation” once actually meant something, and maybe the word was at some point useful. No longer. Through overuse and overly broad application, it has lost all meaning.

The word “innovation” appears 1,290 times on the NSBI website and 2,240 times in government press releases. The best spin on this is we’re a province full of inventors and forward-looking business geniuses, but that seems unlikely.

More likely is that the use of “innovation” is the bullshit tell for business as usual.

4. Downtown Dartmouth plan

I live in the area, and yet I can’t get worked up about the Downtown Dartmouth plan that was rolled out Monday night. That’s because I have zero faith in the planning process. The planning process, after all, brought us the Nova Centre. The planning process brought us Queen’s Marque. The planning process is bringing us the Willow Tree. The planning process brought or is bringing so many exemptions and grandfathered-in projects to both HRM By Design and the Centre Plan that the resulting documents are an insult to any citizen who took the efforts seriously. I fully expect that whatever the planners dream up for downtown Dartmouth and all their pretty maps and graphics will likewise be useless and will be ignored at the first opportunity. Heck, they’re already being ignored:

The response – “The drawings from the posters showing the Portland Street and Alderney Drive redesign that were shown during last night’s meeting were conceptual. Because of this, we will not be posting them to “ 2/2

— Jean Laroche (@larochecbc) October 23, 2018

I saw tens of thousands of committed citizens come out for the HRM by Design meetings, giving up their evenings and providing their often quite educated and intelligent input into the process, only to end up with that giant pile of dung called the Nova Centre. I’ve seen community after community get involved in “community visioning” and a host of other planning processes that promised citizens control over their neighbourhoods and resulted in four-inch planning documents that include bylaw and zoning changes that never got implement, and no funding to implement them. I envision a massive subterranean library of ignored planning documents beneath City Hall, representing tens of millions of public dollars and, worse still, millions of hours of citizen input along with their hopes and belief in the system, all of it wasted.

Why the hell should any citizen, or any reporter, think this will suddenly change because some hotshot planner proposes administrative order 2018-F-U subsection (q) for Downtown Dartmouth? We all know that as soon as some speculator pieces together a block or two of Portland Street, he (always a he) will get to tear down the existing small storefronts and build whatever ugly monstrosity he wants. The Downtown Dartmouth plan won’t stop that. The laughingly toothless Design Review Committee won’t stop that. If a staffer objects, they’ll get fired. And city council will approve the monstrosity. That’s how it works. That’s how it’s always worked. And that’s how it will work forever more.

But maybe one or two of you naive readers have hope! for the Downtown Dartmouth plan. If so, you can read Zane Woodford’s reporting on the plan.

5. Highway death

“One person has died following a single-vehicle collision in Musquodoboit Harbour, N.S.,” reports CTV. “Halifax District RCMP and emergency crews responded to the scene on Highway 7, across from the Twin Oaks Memorial Hospital, early Wednesday morning.”


The RCMP have issued this release:

At 2:21 a.m. today, a woman walked into the Twin Oaks Hospital on Hwy. 7. She was disoriented and had a cut on her face. Staff was unable to get much information from her about what had happened, so the RCMP was contacted. 

Police determined quickly that the woman had been a passenger in a collision that occurred a short time earlier near the hospital on Hwy. 7. The single vehicle that had been involved in the collision crossed the road into the oncoming lane and struck a pole. The male driver, a 24-year-old man from Head of Jeddore, died at the scene. The female passenger was transferred to hospital in Dartmouth for further treatment.




Community Design Advisory Committee (Wednesday, 11:30am, City Hall) — the most useless city committee is pretending it will do something meaningful with the Centre Plan.


Transportation Standing Committee (Thursday, 1pm, City Hall) — here’s the agenda.



Public Accounts (Wednesday, 9am, Province House) — Karen Hudson, the deputy minister at Justice, will be asked about the Auditor General’s report on the jails.

On campus



Thesis Defence, Oceanography (Wednesday, 1:30pm, Room 3107, Mona Campbell Building) — PhD candidate Pengcheng Wang​ will defend his ​​thesis, “Wave-Current Interactions in t​​he Eastern Canadian Waters​​.”

YouTube video

Angry Inuk (Thursday, 7:00pm, Ondaatje Hall, Marion McCain Building) — screening and discussion.


YouTube video

Paywall: The Business of Scholarship (Thursday, 12pm, Room 5053, Rowe Management Building) — screening of the documentary. From the listing:

Paywall: The Business of Scholarship is a documentary which focuses on the need for open access to research and science, questions the rationale behind the $25.2 billion a year that flows into for-profit academic publishers, examines the 35–40% profit margin associated with the top academic publisher Elsevier and looks at how that profit margin is often greater than some of the most profitable tech companies like Apple, Facebook and Google.

Guy Livingston (Thursday, 12pm, Room 406, Dalhousie Arts Centre) — the pianist/broadcaster/artist will speak.

La Falange y el Discurso de la Hegemonia Cultural en la España Prefranquista (Thursday, 4pm, Room 2130, McCain Arts and Social Sciences Building) — Maria Jose Gimenez Mico will deliver this lecture in Spanish.

Rick Hansen (Thursday, 7pm, McInnes Room, Student Union Building) — the disability activist and former Paralympian will speak. Register here.

Mini Medical School (Thursday, 7pm, Theatre B, Tupper Link) — Geoffrey Williams will speak on “Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease; The Burn that Burns”, followed at 8:15 by Heather Rigby on “Movement Disorders.”


Degrees of Willing: Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Buddhist Thought(Wednesday, 4:05pm, KTS Lecture Room, University of King’s College) — Douglas Berger from Leiden University, Netherlands, will speak.

In the harbour

06:00: ZIM Qingdao, container ship, arrives at Pier 42 from Algeciras, Spain
06:00: Oceanex Sanderling, ro-ro container, arrives at Pier 41 from St. John’s
07:40: Silver Wind, cruise ship with up to 355 passengers, arrives at Pier 23 from Bar Harbor (eight-day cruise, Boston to Montreal)
09:30: Valle Azzurra, oil tanker, arrives at Imperial Oil from Delaware City
16:30: ZIM Qingdao sails for New York
18:00: Silver Wind sails for Sydney
21:30: Victory 1, cruise ship, sails from Pier 24 for sea


I’ll be on The Sheldon MacLeod Show, News 95.7, at 2pm. I’ll try to get hopeful about something by then.

The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Tim Bousquet is the editor and publisher of the Halifax Examiner. Twitter @Tim_Bousquet Mastodon

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. When you see so many examples of planning strategies that have been ridden over rough shod by developers, how can anyone take planning processes seriously in this city?

  2. I was at the downtown Dartmouth meeting and even the presenter wasn’t able to say that there was any solidity to the plan, even of the protection of the small waterside park along Alderney.
    The meeting was open to questions, but most of the time was taken by Ms. McClusky who really should have let the other people there ask their questions, rather than grandstanding. I imagine some had something to say, futile though it was.

    There is no requirement for affordable or accessible housing – just bribes for short-term accommodation. I was told at the meeting that one person refused an accessible apartment in King’s Wharf as they didn’t like the layout – so therefore they should not build them? The already in existence cheaper apartment blocks have no accessible apartments at all.
    Left a bad taste in my mouth.

  3. Any development proposal submitted to HRM for approval before the Centre Plan is approved by council will be allowed to be approved under the rules in place at the time of submission for 12 months after the approval of the Centre Plan..
    I see Mayor Savage and Coun. Mason met with members of the ILA executive to discuss the expansion of Halterm. Let me cut through the political BS on Halterm. The federal Liberals are running around Canada trying to dampen down any issue that may hinder the re-election of certain members and Andy Fillmore posts an op-ed that we all need to have a conversation about Halterm. And of course the notion of building a whole new terminal at Woodside once again raises its ugly head. Mayor Savage has been silent on the problems of a terminal in Woodside as have other politicians in Dartmouth – Liberal MP Darren Fisher,Liberal councillors Karsten and Mancini are silent and Sam Austin have all gone silent.
    Talking about a Downtown Dartmouth Plan and densifying the area is a waste of time if 1 mile long load of containers are to be trundling through downtown Dartmouth because rich people in the south end of Halifax want the terminal moved.
    The Avery on Alderney Drive overlooks the train tracks on the Dartmouth waterfront. Of the 69 units only 16 have been sold. And how does talking about the possibility of container trains passing by the expensive condos help sales ?
    Our politicians need to summon up the courage to loudly oppose any notion of a container terminal in Woodside. It may make sense to Liberals and aAndy Fillmore but bit makes no planning sense and no financial sense.
    The port has a sound business plan for the future and Fillmore should be fighting to get it approved and fighting to get the money from Ottawa.

    1. Container traffic should be routed through the south end rail cut. No brainer.

      Damn the Risleys of the world who want otherwise.

  4. You know what would make a great story? The totals that the city and the province have given corporations in “innovation rebates” “payroll rebates” and the plethora of government corporate handouts for say, the last 5 years. Irving, RBC, Michelin, Manulife and the unpaid loans, loss of investment of tax dollars in private venture schemes. It would be great to have that information at hand to argue government cuts to programs that actually help people and create jobs like the Film Tax Credit. I’d chip in for that research.