In the harbour
Hundreds of people showed up on the Halifax Common last night for the Vigil for Orlando.
2. Losing the forest — and the species — for the trees
Reporter Jennifer Henderson reviews the most recent report from Auditor General Michael Pickup, who criticizes the Department of Natural Resources for failing to implement legally required plans to save endangered and threatened species.
Click here to read “Losing the forest — and the species — for the trees.”
This article is behind the Examiner’s paywall and so available only to paid subscribers. Click here to purchase a subscription.
I’m convinced they write these press releases specifically to rub my nose in the language:
New Program Helps Businesses Create World-class Tourism Experiences
Tourism Nova Scotia announced today, June 13, the first participants in a new program that is following through on the Crown corporation’s commitment to change how it approaches tourism.
The World-Class Experience EXCELLerator program will help businesses develop tourism experiences that are authentic and differentiate Nova Scotia as a travel destination. The experiences are supported by market research that shows their potential to attract visitors from key markets.
“We’re excited to collaborate with Tourism Nova Scotia on our culinary kayak experience,” said Angelo Spinazzola, owner of North River Kayak Tours in Cape Breton and program participant. “By combining our expertise with Tourism Nova Scotia’s, we’ll build a unique, world-class experience that visitors will be talking about for a lifetime.”
Focusing on world-class experiences is a pillar of Tourism Nova Scotia’s strategy that outlines how it will help the industry meet the One Nova Scotia goal of doubling annual tourism revenues to $4 billion by 2024.
“World-class” is Halifax’s original bullshit term, brought to town initially by none other than Fred MacGillivray and used ever since by every grifter and schemer hoping to bamboozle the public.
Oh, and just a reminder: the $4 billion is a diversion. As I’ve explained before:
See what they did there? Yep, they included Nova Scotia residents travelling within the province in the total $2 billion figure in order to figure economic impact. This is a big no-no in economic impact reports.
If the new convention centre includes local meetings in its calculation of economic impact, it will be lying to citizens. If the Halifax Association of Disgruntled Journalists (HADJ) decides to hold its annual general meeting at the new convention centre instead of the Woodside Beverage Room, it doesn’t magically create new money in the province. Likewise, if I decide to spend the weekend in Canso instead of staying in Dartmouth, it might help the owners of the Canso Beverage Room (where I’d inevitably spend all my dough), but only at the cost to the owners of the Woodside Beverage Room. There’s no new money created.
So “doubling” tourism revenue to $4 billion might be achievable by simply getting people to knock off work early on Fridays and spending the day at the beer garden. The productivity loss would be far greater than the increase in beer sales, but tourism promoters could point to the increased beer sales and say the economy is doing great. Heck, if we give everyone Thursdays and Fridays off, we’d do that much better economically.
If we’re going to be remotely honest about this, what we should be seeking to double is not the $2 billion figure, but rather the $1.2 billion spent by people who come from out of province.
4. Ships on the cheap
“The federal government said Monday it will streamline its warship replacement program by purchasing an off-the-shelf design to save money and speed the process,” reports the Canadian Press:
Public Services Minister Judy Foote made the announcement today at Irving Shipbuilding‘s Halifax headquarters, saying a single competitive process will select an existing warship design along with the systems and equipment that will be integrated on the vessels.
5. Sidney Crosby
Exhausted from the celebratory rioting, Cole Harbourites now say they want to rename Forest Hills Parkway after Sidney Crosby.
It’s a bad idea to name stuff after living people because no matter how much we admire them, the celebrityhood might go to their heads and their lives may go horribly sideways. And, it’s not a great idea to name stuff after dead people, either — that Stairs Street thing is beyond insulting, for example. What’s wrong with “Forest Hills Parkway”? It’s perfectly descriptive, and it’s unlikely the entire neighbourhood of Forest Hills will commit a mass bank holdup, or whatever.
And really: if we name a road after Sid, it’d only encourage him to start stealing road signs. He’s a Cole Harbour kid, after all.
1. Marilla Stephenson
“Consider Marilla Stephenson, the long time Halifax Herald columnist who neatly timed her buyout-package two years ago with an 18-month contract to advise Premier Stephen McNeil’s One Nova Scotia Coalition on the Ivany report,” writes Stephen Kimber:
Last week, Stephenson won a competition for a newly invented civil service “leadership role”: managing director of corporate and external relations in the Executive Council Office. She’ll liaise with key players in various departments, including Laura Lee Langley, the former MITV anchor, now deputy minister in the Office of the Premier.
Kimber is looking at the astonishing number of ex-journalists landing in the McNeil government — Stephenson joins Langley, JackIe Foster, Laurie Graham, and David Jackson.
I disagree with Kimber, who argues that “journalistic skills — the ability to research, assimilate unfamiliar information and communicate it clearly and quickly as story — are valuable transferrable skills.” On the contrary, political staffers need a combination of party allegiance and YesSirism that good reporters lack.
We can argue about that, I guess; I’ll grant the point that the rest of the pack were very good journalists — I suspect they’re now having a hard time biting their tongues — but Stephenson? As a columnist, she always struck me as merely a Liberal Party hack, simply repeating mantralike from the neocon Bible about slashing budgets and government staff.
I find a particular irony in Stephenson’s January 31, 2013 Chronicle Herald column, an attack on the then-NDP government of Darrell Dexter headlined “Top 10 ways for N.S. to shed baggage, cut costs.” In the column, Stephenson rattles off predictable neocon solutions to supposed budget woes — privatize health care, attack teacher unions, kill the government-owned asphalt plant — but of particular interest given that Stephenson is landing a job at a newly created government communications position is point 2:
2. Get rid of about half of the communications machine and the large number of full-time government employees now operating under government jurisdiction. Yes, there is such a thing as too much information.
I guess so long as the half of the communications staff being shown the exit door aren’t connected Liberal insiders, it’s a good plan.
2. Cranky letter of the day
While on a recent Sunday walk in Victoria Park, I came across 15 to 20 owners with their pets out enjoying the sun and fresh air, on the upper trails. Of that total, I would guess five of the pets were on leash. Most were off.
In 2015, I had four, fairly serious incidents involving off-leash dogs. In 2014 I had three.
In one case, a larger mid-sized dog charged at my wife and me from a distance, as its owner watched on. I yelled to the pet owner: “Is he friendly?” She responded: “No he is not.”
The dog ran to within 10 feet barking and growling, stopped and, then lunged forward, challenging. Meanwhile, my wife is shouting to the owner to “get control of her dog.”
Had this been a child or more senior individual I shudder to think of the consequences.
The verbal confrontation that followed with the dog owner was not pleasant for any involved.
Another time, a young man was approaching with an off-leash larger shepherd/collie mix. It was running up behind a female jogger and though the owner was calling, the dog was not responsive. After repeated verbal warnings it broke off and as we approached, the dog ran directly at us, which scared my wife. I warned the dog off with a loud verbal command. As I passed the owner I said, “Your dog should be on a leash.” The owner responded in an aggressive/sarcastic manner and what followed was a very serious verbal confrontation that was more like an uncontrolled road rage incident.
Those are but two examples of just my experiences.
Dog owners and dog walkers, this is not a dog park. It is a park where you can enjoy nature at its best. You are allowed to bring your “best friend” with you, provided it is kept under control and you clean up behind it.
I raise the issue and welcome comments from other park users to generate possible solutions, such as more signage and stern warnings/tickets from authorities to owners who refuse to “get it.” I am not anti-dog. I am, however, opposed to people who think they know their dogs but either don’t know how or won’t control aggressive moves toward unsuspecting citizens who are out and simply want to enjoy Victoria Park’s trails.
Raymond Lindsay, Salmon River
City Council (1pm, City Hall) — here’s the agenda. I’ll be live-blogging the meeting via the Examiner’s Twitter account, @hfxExaminer.
No public meetings.
Rubik’s Cube (11:30am, Slonim Conference Room, Goldberg Computer Science Building) — Robert Smith, a Master’s student in the Faculty of Computer Science, will speak on “Discovering Rubik’s Cube Subgroups Using Coevolutionary GP — a Five Twist Experiment” His abstract:
This work reports on an approach to direct policy discovery (a form of reinforcement learning) using genetic programming (GP) for the 3x3x3 Rubik’s Cube. Specifically, a synthesis of two approaches is proposed: 1) a previous group theoretic formulation is used to suggest a sequence of objectives for developing solutions to different stages of the overall task; and 2) a hierarchical formulation of GP policy search is utilized in which policies adapted for an earlier objective are explicitly transferred to aid the construction of policies for the next objective. The resulting hierarchical organization of policies explicitly demonstrates task decomposition and policy reuse. Algorithmically, the process makes use of a recursive call to a common approach for maintaining a diverse population of GP individuals and then learns how to reuse subsets of programs (policies) developed against the earlier objective. Other than the two objectives, we do not explicitly identify how to decompose the task or mark specific policies for reuse. Moreover, at the end of evolution we return a population solving 100% of 17,675,698 different initial Cubes for the two objectives currently in use.
In the harbour
5:30am: Glovis Clipper, car carrier, arrives at Autoport from Emden, Germany
6am: Oceanex Sanderling, ro-ro cargo, arrives at Pier 41 from St. John’s
7:15am: Norwegian Gem, cruise ship, arrives at Pier 22 from New York
10am: OOCL Kaohsiung, container ship, arrives at Fairview Cove from Cagliari, Italy
11am: Thalatta, ro-ro cargo, arrives at Pier TBD from Southhampton, England
11:30am: Glovis Clipper, car carrier, sails from Autoport to sea
11:30am: Oceanex Sanderling, ro-ro cargo, moves from Pier 41 to Autoport
4pm: Atlantic Conveyor, container ship, arrives at Fairview Cove from Liverpool, England
4pm: Dallas Express, container ship, sails from Fairview Cove for Southhampton, England
4:15pm: Oceanex Sanderling, ro-ro cargo, moves from Autoport back to Pier 41
6pm: Prince I, oil tanker, arrives at anchorage for bunkers from Beaumont, Texas
6pm: Norwegian Gem, cruise ship, sails from Pier 22 for Saint John
6am: ZIM Tarragona, container ship, arrives at Pier 41 from Valencia, Spain
Tempa says I always have to write something here.
Please consider subscribing to the Examiner. Just $5 or $10 a month goes a long way. Or, consider making a one-time contribution via PayPal. Thanks much!
You just can’t self impose the term “world class”, it must be earned just like everything else of value. Calling oneself “world-class” is meaningless without the recognition of your peers around the world.
You just can’t spend your way to the top of the “class”.
Love your work Tim.
There is no doubt whatsoever that Sydney Crosby could be one of the greatest names to emerge from Cole Harbour. But lets not be too hasty about naming things just yet.
No mention of the Hurricanes winning the NBL title last night. How do you overlook that?
I’m boycotting businesses that advertise in the Chronicle Herald, to begin…
But Lever is one of the shareholders of the Hurricanes, so I don’t know how they can just stop advertising in the Herald.
I don’t understand the “but” part.
The author of the Cranky Letter sounds pretty reasonable to me. I’m a dog owner and am routinely shocked how some owners let their dogs go out of control off the leash. They don’t seem to get that not everyone loves their animal or that dogs intimidate/frighten a lot of people.
Who is the ‘world-class’ rhetoric aimed at? Surely no-one who’s been out of the Maritimes, you know, the world. Funny, when I was in a major European city last year, I saw no mention of ‘world-class’ anything. One thing that I’ve found that major metropoli (metropolis’?; metropolissippis?) have in common is a functioning transit system, walkable streetscapes and buildings with historical relevance and context in the built environment. Perhaps Halifax should work on achieving these…
Right from the monorail song: “It’s a world-class idea” -> “just tell us what it is and we’ll vote for it!”
Just be happy his name isn’t Sydney Cornwallis.
Cranky letter of the day: BRAVO! I agree 100%. I am afraid of dogs and often encounter dog owners who assume it is their and their dogs’ right to approach me, with no regard as to whether I am afraid or their dog is friendly or not. I am own cats and they live in my house and impact no one, but the people in the house. They don’t dig in others’ gardens or kill the birds, nor do I assume it is my right to take them places and assume others want them in their personal spaces. It would be great if all pet owners respected others’ rights!
There is no surer sign of being a parochial backwater than using the term “world-class”. It always reminds me of those old Simpson’s episodes from the 90s about monorails.