In the harbour


1. Vote for permanent residents

On Mayor Mike Savage’s initiative, the city has asked the province to change the city charter such that permanent residents can vote in municipal elections. That request prompted Mark Furey, the former minister of municipal affairs, to send a letter to the city, reports Metro:

In the letter, Furey tells Halifax mayor Mike Savage he’s happy that he’s “elevated the discussion” on the topic of voting rights for permanent residents, but that the province is “not prepared to move forward” unless permanent residents are given all three rights: to vote, to run for office and to nominate candidates.

The letter was revealed at yesterday’s meeting of city council’s Executive Standing Committee. At the meeting, Savage and several councillors took issue with Furey, saying they hadn’t asked that permanent residents be allowed to run for office. Their hope is that newly appointed minister, Zach Churchill, will be more flexible.

2. Signs

No signs allowed, but this monstrosity is A-OK.
No signs allowed, but this monstrosity is A-OK.

Like salmon returning to the spawning grounds and Pavlov’s dogs drooling at the sound of the dinner bell, business people complain about red tape. That’s just what they do — it doesn’t matter whether the “red tape” was created for good reason or not, from the business person’s perspective, it’s always a bad thing. So, you know, grain of salt.

But I gotta say, Mark Peyton and Liam Hennessey kind of have a point. As the Chronicle Herald reports:

[Hennessey’s] frustration is exacerbated by the fact that directly out his front door on Market Street is the convention centre construction project. He’s remained silent about street closures, noise, dust, heavy machinery, customers’ inability to find his business and delivery trucks not being able to reach him.

That his reward for being a good neighbour would be the denial of his application for a sign is disappointing, said Hennessey.

When all of downtown is one hellish construction site with dirt and fences and noise and port-a-potties everywhere, and when the point of that construction is to build a gigantic, hideous blue glass monument to Joe Ramia’s ego that will cast a portending shadow of doom over Argyle Street patios and mucky muck delusion, it’s rather ridiculous to get hung up about a couple of four-foot signs.

There was once probably a good or at least a defensible reason to regulate signs in the business district. But whatever the reasoning was, it was all thrown out the window when the two-block Nova Centre complex was exempted from* all planning and design rules.

* yes, technically, the Nova Centre is allowed under HRM By Design, but only because the rules were written such as to specifically exempt it from the rules. These are the verbal gymnastics we put ourselves through as part of our lies to ourselves.

3. Morgan Wheeldon

Morgan Wheeldon
Morgan Wheeldon

Morgan Wheeldon, the NDP’s candidate in the federal election for the Kings-Hants riding, was forced to resign after a Conservative Party attack website,, published some Facebook comments Wheeldon had made about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:

One could argue that Israel’s intention was always to ethnically cleanse the region — there are direct quotations proving this to be the case. Guess we just sweep that under the rug. A minority of Palestinians are bombing buses in response to what appears to be a calculated effort to commit a war crime.

Wheeldon says the site took his comments out of context. “The context changes the entirety of this whole thing and it makes exceptionally clear that this is a dirty smear and it’s shameful,” he told TC Media:

Wheeldon said his true personal views are actually in line with the NDP platform.

“My position on Israel has always been that they deserve a safe and secure state, one that works with Canada and I also agree personally with the two-state solution in the NDP platform,” he said.

This episode makes the NDP look weak.

First, the party and Canadians generally should be able to have a nuanced discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the demonstrable fact that there was and is a desire among some Israelis to remove all Palestinians from the region. Should that be the entire discussion? No, but neither should it be off limits.

Second, is the NDP going to cave to every Conservative attack that brings up Israel? Is the party incapable of explaining its position to the public?

Wheeldon has a defensible position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, well within the limits of debate even within Israel itself, and certainly among the Canadian public. But he lost me when he resorted to Nova Scotia’s cyber-bullying legislation:

Wheeldon said what is being circulated doesn’t fall under defamation because he’s a public figure but if he were a private citizen, it would fall under cyberbullying legislation.

“Being accused of being an anti-Semite, that’s pretty much defamation if I was a private citizen.”

The cyberbullying law was written and passed in haste, and will almost certainly be overturned by the courts. But it was a response to the tragic circumstances of Rehtaeh Parson’s suicide, and so could perhaps be excused as a well-intentioned effort in defence of vulnerable children. That it is now being used as an argument against free speech in political debate — and like it or not, the Conservative attack website should be protected free speech — is outrageous. (Incidentally, Wheeldon’s wrong, there is no public figure exemption in Nova Scotia’s Cyber-safety Act.)

People in public life should behave as adults. That means being able to hear complex and contrary opinions and taking criticism. That applies to the NDP, and to Wheeldon. Get a backbone already.

4. Wild kingdom

Photo: Bryan Ray via the CBC
Photo: Bryan Ray via the CBC

Groundhogs are overrunning the suburbs, reports the CBC. Hide your children!


1. Sidewalks

Photo: Halifax Examiner
Photo: Halifax Examiner

The consultant’s report submitted to council last week was an utter failure, says Erica Butler:

I had hoped to read a report considering the extent of the effects of last winter’s impassable sidewalks: People unable to get to work or run basic errands, people breaking bones and otherwise injuring themselves on the ice, those with mobility challenges left effectively stranded and all the lost productivity that these things bring.

I thought I would read a report suggesting ways to up our game and cope with ice in the future, so as not to bring our city to its knees (literally and figuratively) for weeks at a time. 

Instead, I read a report on how we can outsource our financial risk, as if our city’s managers actually believe that cost overruns were the big problem with the winter of 2014-15.

2. Density

“There are legitimate reasons why people oppose many developments in Halifax, such as bad design or wind and shadow impacts, and I am sometimes involved in that opposition,” says Tristan Cleveland. “To oppose the people who may live in those buildings, however, is a tendency which I reject. We must unmask the words, ‘I am against density,’ for what they mean: ‘I am against more people living here.’ For practical and moral reasons, I believe opposition to new neighbours is wrong.”

3. Green

Sean Gillis likes the parks and trails in the Annapolis Valley.

4. Cranky letter of the day

The Irving Oil Refinery in Saint John. Photo:nFrancis Vachon
The Irving Oil Refinery in Saint John. Photo: Francis Vachon

To the Chronicle Herald:

As an energy policy analyst for 40 years, now retired, I would like to respectfully point out to my fellow Herald readers that all the arguments about gas prices (drop in value of Canadian dollar, crisis in refinery upgrades) do not apply to the Irving refinery in New Brunswick. And therefore Irving gas should cost 20 per cent less.

Phil Thompson, Petpeswick


No public meetings.

I’ve long thought that there’s not enough reporting done on Nova Scotia’s Public Accounts. If there’s ever a J-school class looking for a project, simply going through Public Accounts would be worth an entire semester’s work.

I don’t have an entire semester, or even an hour, but from time to time I’ll pull some information from Public Accounts to demonstrate, well, something.

Today, let’s look at government payments to IBM. Recall that in 2012 the Dexter government outsourced the province’s SAP system to IBM, with this declaration:

The province has a 10-year contract with IBM, starting at $8.4 million per year, for the SAP work. That’s the same as the current cost, Dexter said. The annual price will increase, though, based on a cost-of-living index used in the IT sector, the Finance Department says.

Here are the actual total government payments to IBM through the years:

2011-12: $1,772,659.68
2012-13: $5,901,595.13
2013-14: $15,573,435.29
2014-15: $26,508,079.54

Not all of the payments are related to SAP work, but it’s clear that at the very least, IBM has been able to leverage its SAP operations to bid on other provincial work that presumably in the past went to local firms. My guess is that the SAP costs have spiralled upwards due to change orders and the like.

In the harbour

The seas around Nova Scotia, 8:30am Tuesday. Map:
The seas around Nova Scotia, 8:30am Tuesday. Map:

NYK Constellation, container ship, arrived at Fairview Cove from New York this morning, will sail to sea at 4pm
Asphalt Star, asphalt/bitumen tanker, Tarragona, Spain to McAsphalt
Helga, general cargo, Bilboa, Spain to Pier 31
Atlantic Compass, ro-ro container, New York to Fairview Cove


Trying to get some stuff done today.

Tim Bousquet is the editor and publisher of the Halifax Examiner. Twitter @Tim_Bousquet Mastodon

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. I appreciated your piece on Palestine, Israel and the NDP. The current Conservative Government’s position on that situation is one that is entirely biased and inappropriate for a Canadian government. As well as being particular to only this government. It neither represents the views of informed citizens or of the great majority of the international community. The NDP doesn’t need to apologize for standing up for peace process that the current Prime Minister of Israel has publicly stated he has no intention whatsoever to negotiate.

  2. Thanks for sharing the article by Tirstan Cleveland. He is expressing something that I, too, have found disturbing about the movement to oppose certain developments.

    He wrote ‘I am against density,’ for what they mean: ‘I am against more people living here.’

    I hear people, at public meetings or consultations, say essentially “my neighbourhood is really nice the way it is and this development will ruin its great qualities”. What I hear is, “I live here and I like it and I don’t want to share it”. (Most recently re. the Robie and Quinpool proposal.) This makes me uncomfortable because it seems selfish, possibly elitist; it also disappoints me because it tends to come from educate and ‘liberal’ people of whom I have higher expectations.

    1. NO sensible person is «against densification» but THINKING PEOPLE are against the asinine way in which Halifax has been carved up and thrown to the Development Dragons. Where through highways were needed, readily available land was given away to these pirates CREATING huge traffic snarling obstructions and overloading the already choked arteries with uncontrolled traffic growth. The entire waterfront of Halifax has become an impassible, ugly and uncomfortable chain of glass-and-steel canyons created by 20-year write-off hi-rise SHACKS. Yes, the Peninsula needs to densify, but in a PLANNED manner taking into account a little more than WHO can make the MOST money, the FASTEST!

  3. I have not seen that version of the Nova Centre in awhile. If you expect it to look like that your in for a surprise.

  4. Furey is logical, Council is pandering. Mike Savage never held such an opinion when an MP; and if he had ,it would have been contrary to the constitution.

    1. Nobody is suggesting permanent residents be given the right to vote in federal or provincial elections. It’s not counter to the constitution to let them vote in municipal elections. Toronto has considered it, and it is in place in a number of cities in other countries.

      1. Why should the vote be OK for municipal but not the two higher levels. It is illogical to argue for a partial exercise of the franchise and at the same time disallow such exercise in elections of greater importance.
        A Canadian cannot vote in a Nova Scotia provincial election unless she/he has been a resident for 6 months.
        As to the constitutional issue it is sensible to read the constitution into lower level view legislation. What other countries do is not relevant.

  5. Churchill did not sounds interested in making it happen (re: permanent residents voting) today when we he was interviewed on Info AM.