This date in history
In the harbour
1. Teachers reject contract offer
Sixty-one per cent of Nova Scotia Teachers Union members voted to reject the province’s tentative contract offer on Tuesday night.
Conciliation likely will be the next step, given that union leaders had said they don’t expect a better offer from government.
That means at some point, a strike vote will be held, or the province could legislate a contract, the most extreme option for both sides respectively.
When asked what swayed the teachers to vote the way they did, [union president] Morse said members are upset with their working conditions and would have liked to have seen some of those issues addressed in this contract.
“The working conditions that they are dealing with are terrible,” Morse said.
“Class sizes are huge in some grade levels. We don’t have enough resources to deliver our programs properly. We don’t have the proper services to help students with varying needs. We have class composition issues. The workload has increased considerably because of PowerSchool and TIENET (reporting systems).”
The computer systems have loomed large for the teachers I’ve spoken with. Using the software is time-consuming, and in the teachers’ eyes, the systems amount to micro-managing and are counter to the teaching mission. The software is updated or vendors changed every year or so, for what some teachers think are nefarious purposes.
Beyond that, I think teachers have finally hit a breaking point in terms of how much they will allow themselves to be vilified and attacked. And union members thought their leadership had abandoned them. Many people who claimed to be teachers weighed in on the issue in the comment section of the CBC article on their vote:
I am a teacher. I voted “no.” Not because of the salary proposal. Not because of the service award. I voted “no” because there was no bargaining. I voted “no” because my union should not roll over to the government’s bully tactics. The membership of the union made a strong statement tonight. I hope the membership continues to demand more from Union leadership.
If anyone thinks this was about money, then they haven’t spoken to a teacher lately. The salary offer will be the first thing to go and I think most teachers understood that. This was about real values and real reform. Even if everyone ends up back where they were in 6 months, both the Union and the Government have some deep reflecting to do.
I am a teacher in Cole Harbour and yes, I 100% voted no and it had nothing to do with money. We are all very aware that we teach in a debt-ridden province. We don’t do what we do for money. We do it because we love your children and we want to see them LEARN.
What was rejected here was not a salary offer. What was rejected here was bullying tactics and demonstrated contempt for teachers and for labour practices fundamental to a democracy. Stephen MacNeil is Harper-light. Get the message, Liberals: we’re finished with that kind of politic.
As a teacher, I can’t teach my students that we don’t tolerate bullying in school, then accept it in my own life. The government’s tactics, of take it or else, are shameful and should not be tolerated by anyone. It was for that reason alone that I voted NO!
These are pseudonymous comments because teachers aren’t allowed to speak publicly on political issues (think about that for a moment….), but the comments reflect the sentiments I’ve heard from teachers I know.
City clerk Cathy Mellet dropped a bombshell at yesterday’s city council meeting: Intelivote, the electronic voting firm hired by the city to conduct the internet and phone portions of city elections, including January’s District 6 byelection, is for sale and may soon be in receivership to the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA).
I’ve written extensively about Intelivote, and profiled the company in 2008. Intellivote founder and CEO Dean Smith was generous with his time, open to critique, and has made himself available for followup in the years since. (I didn’t have time to speak with him yesterday afternoon.)
Intelivote has been the recipient of considerable government largesse, both federal and provincial.
On the federal side, ACOA has given the following “financial assistance” to Intelivote through the years:
All the listed payments were loans, except for the last, which was an outright grant. Which is curious, because ACOA typically doesn’t threaten to call in a failed loan until all possible options are explored; the $50,000 grant was likely made even though ACOA must have been aware of the company’s difficulties. It looks to me like ACOA was throwing good money after bad in a sort of Hail Mary pass, hoping that the new money would salvage the last half-million dollar loan.
The provincial side is far worse. Nova Scotia Business Inc. has dumped $2.8 million into Intelivote, all of which comes in the form of an equity stake. When the last $800,000 came down in 2012, I asked Smith what would come of the money:
But what do Nova Scotia taxpayers get in return for the $2.8 million invested in Intelivote?
Smith has just eight employees, so the payroll considerations are minimal.
The real potential impact is in future return, says Smith. Technically the province’s money is in the form of “convertible debentures” — that is, loans that can be converted into stock.
“We’re probably a decent takeover target,” explains Smith. The way he sees it, Intelivote is a relatively small firm with a successful product, and so at some point a larger company will want to purchase Intelivote. “They’ll offer four times revenue, or whatever, and that’s when NSBI can cash out its shares for a profit.”
There are about 90 other investors, says Smith, most of who want to see an “exit strategy” of the company getting swallowed by a bigger company. In the meantime, NSBI has one representative — Peter MacNeil — on Intelivote’s five-person board of directors.
(As an aside, that seems to be NSBI’s approach to many of the businesses it has an equity stake in. Investors into the teetering Unique Solutions tell me that the company’s entire mission is to get itself sold, probably as a tax write-off. The way it’s been explained to me is this: if the company’s shares can be consolidated under one owner (probably Toronto-based Northwater Capital’s Intellectual Property Fund), then Canadian tax law allows the “asset” of Unique Solutions and its debt to be purchased by another company, which can use the Unique Solution debt to write down its own tax liabilities. If so, Nova Scotia taxpayers will ultimately have subsidized a tax-avoidance scheme for some larger company.)
As for Intelivote, if ACOA is knocking at its door and threatening to sue, then it’s unlikely the company has much, if anything, in real value. As Jacob Boon reports:
[A] former Intelivote employee who wished to remain nameless says the company has numerous outstanding debts to suppliers.
“They’ve been perpetually out of money for many years,” he says.
Smith believes a potential sale wouldn’t change much in terms of operations.
“It’s going to be the same people, the same system. The interested party that buys the company, it’d be crazy to do anything but carry on with the system.”
But he does admit an asset sale is possible, which wouldn’t include NSBI’s investment (held in common shares) and leave Nova Scotia with little to show for its $2.8 million.
I can’t think of any reason why another electronic voting company would want to purchase Intelivote. It makes no sense. The Spanish firm Scytl, for example, which has dominated the North American market in recent years, has its own large operations and would be in no need of Intelivote’s assets, or even its existing contracts. Maybe there’s some weird financial gimmickry like a tax avoidance scheme that makes “sense,” but not “sense” in terms of bringing any tangible benefit to Nova Scotia.
More likely, Nova Scotian taxpayers have lost the entire $2.8 million. Another NSBI success story.
Boon gets into what the Intelivote collapse means for the city elections already contracted to Intelivote. Mellet assured council yesterday that the next election will go off without a problem.
But this is yet another potential problem with electronic voting. Setting aside the risks of an election being hacked, it makes no sense to contract out the basic infrastructure of elections to private companies — companies that can financially collapse in the lead-up to, or even in the middle of, an election. Criticize Elections Canada, Elections Nova Scotia, and the city’s Elections department all you want, but there’s zero chance that they’ll simply cease operations.
3. Nova Centre construction
It was a meaningless gesture because nothing will come of it, but Halifax council yesterday directed staff to prepare a report about whether and how the city can compensate businesses near the Nova Centre for losses they’re incurring due to construction.
I’ll save everyone the time and money: The city can’t compensate businesses.
I see photos of the glass going up on the project. Blue or green, or maybe both, it’s hard to tell. But this world-class building looks like something right out of 1981.
I wonder how many birds will die. As the New York Times reports:
New York is a major stopover for migratory birds on the Atlantic flyway, and an estimated 90,000 birds are killed by flying into buildings in New York City each year, the Audubon group says. Often, they strike the lower levels of glass facades after foraging for food in nearby parks. Some ornithologists and conservationists say such crashes are the second-leading cause of death for migrating birds, after habitat loss, with estimates of the national toll ranging up to a billion a year.
Usually, the dead birds are removed quickly by rats or other scavengers, or by cleaning crews, and they aren’t on the sidewalks long enough for most pedestrians to realize just how many there are. I’ve heard reports that around some oddly situated buildings dozens of birds are killed a day, although the average is about ten a year, per glass building.
Someone should conduct a dead bird count around Nova Centre.
1. Prince Arthur School
Kate Watson looks at the plans for the new Prince Arthur School in Dartmouth.
2. Cranky letter of the day
I attended a hockey game in Bridgewater on Nov. 21. My grandson was playing for South Shore Lumberjacks. Late in the game, he sustained a facial injury and needed stitches. We left for home at 10:30 p.m. and he went to hospital. We found out later he got out of hospital at 5:30 a.m. He had another game Sunday at 2:30 p.m. in Truro. This was far too long to get stitched up. I hope health services improve soon.
George R. Noble, Annapolis County
City council (9:30am, City Hall) — council starts its budget deliberations.
North West Planning Advisory Committee (7pm, The Four Pad Arena in Bedford With the Name of a Fucking Bank Plastered on it) — a tiny issue is under consideration.
Public Accounts (9am, Province House) — Paul LaFleche, Deputy Minister at the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, will be asked about “Investment in Road Improvements and Repairs.”
Law Amendments (9:30am, Province House) — under consideration:
Bill No. 112 – Children and Family Services Act (amended) (deferred from previous meeting)
Bill No. 118 – Heritage Property Act (amended) (deferred from previous meeting)
Bill No. 131 – Maintenance and Custody Act (amended) (deferred from previous meeting)
Bill No. 133 – Motor Vehicle Act (amended) (deferred from previous meeting)
Bill No. 134 – Liquor Control Act (amended) (deferred from previous meeting)
Bill No. 136 – Motor Vehicle Act (amended) (deferred from previous meeting)
Standing Committee on Private & Local Bills (11:15, One Government Place) — under consideration:
Bill No. 125 – Zion United Baptist Church of Yarmouth Disolution Act (no representation)
Bill No. 137 – Presbyterian Church Legislation, An Act Respecting the Repeal of (no representation)
This date in history
On December 2, 1963, Energy Minister Bud Drury announced that a heavy water plant, necessary for CANDU reactors, would open at Glace Bay. That created prosperity forever, amen, for Cape Breton.
Thesis defence, Biochemistry (11am, Room L10, Sir Charles Tupper Medical Building Link) — Masters student Robin Elisabeth Patterson will defend her thesis, “Probing Membrane Catalyzed Apelin-Receptor Interactions by Fluorescence Spectroscopy.”
Thesis defence, Engineering (1pm, Room 3107, Mona Campbell Building) — PhD candidate Marta Piercey will defend her thesis, “Factors that Influence Biofilm Formation, Desiccation resistance, and Sanitizer Susceptibility in Listeria Monocytogenes at a Simulated Food Processing Plant Temperature of 15°C.”
Southern Ocean productivity (4pm, Theatre A, Sir Charles Tupper Medical Building Link) — Erin Bertrand will speak on “The role of cobalamin in diatom molecular physiology and interactions with bacteria: implications for Southern Ocean productivity.”
In the harbour
ZIM Tarragona, container ship, Valencia, Spain to Pier 41, then sails to sea
Oakland Express, container ship, New York to Fairview Cove
Macao Strait, container ship, Lisbon, Portugal to Pier 42
Kobe Express sails to sea
I’ll be on The Sheldon MacLeod Show, News 95.7, at 4pm.
Legislating the teachers back to work will surely work. Teach them a lesson. The beatings will continue until morale improves. Or until the last teacher leaves for Alberta.
See how it’s playing out in Kansas: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kansas-teacher-shortage_55b913ebe4b0074ba5a729d5
WATCH YOUR MOUTH
How is it that it is only unions that use “extortion tactics”–never employers. Only unions that “hold us all ransom”–never employers. Only unions that “only think of themselves”–never employers. Only unions that “don’t care who they hurt”–never employers. Only unions that “want too much”–never employers. Only unions that “just won’t be reasonable”–never employers. Only unions that…well, you get the point.
“Extortion tactics” in comment above pushes my buttons. In trying to be fair whilst also a union sympathizer, I realize the inflammatory phrase could apply to either side, and to any management-union dispute — it depends on individual perspective, ideology, how dueling sides are presented in the media, as well as the scope of public interest and impact. Teachers’ unions are probably the most recognized of the professional variety. They impact the present and future of our most beloved, our children, so their job-related behaviour elicits emotional, and sometimes irrational, public reaction. The thing is, “a rose by any other name” applies more widely to unions than we’re often aware. Medical associations, medical interns, academic faculties, electricians, railway workers, journalists all have various unions, sometimes by other names, and we may hear little from or about them. The fees and related conditions medical associations negotiate with governments impact us all, but they’re done silently and in secret. Greater cultural respect for both the medical profession and its power are often decisive, pervasive factors in the latter negotiations. So why not for teachers? And why is there such censure, vitriol and even hatred flung at “lower-level” union action? I suggest it’s snobbery, more plainly, it’s the ugly, prevailing class system in which some are considered more worthy than others. In addition, union leadership – how sophisticated, how articulate, how media-savvy he/she is – are all factors which wash over and play into public opinion, though they may have little direct connection to the union-management issues at play. Personally, I’m for arbitration across the board as long as process, terms, result, and choice of arbitrator(s) are transparent, mutually negotiated, and agreed in advance.
Because except for our labour laws today, the tactics used by unions when they go on strike, or companies when they lock out employees is essentially an extortion tactic… consider this definition.
Extortion means: “the practice of obtaining something, especially money, through force or threats.”
Sounds a lot like what happens when one goes on strike or locks out the employees, eh? Only legal because of labour laws.
Before we have another teacher’s strike, a binding arbitration process should be invoked. No one truly wins as a result of a strike… this antiquated collective bargaining process through extortion tactics needs to be retired, IMO
“On the federal side, ACOA has given the following “financial assistance” to ACOA through the years:”
Do you mean financial assistance to Intellivote? Or do I need MORE coffee? I’m fact-checking and proofreading copy today for work and this leaped out at me during my second cup of coffee.
You’re correct. Will fix.