1. Police Commission

I have left this item for last to write about today, simply because it’s so dispiriting.

I spent a couple of hours watching the police commission in action yesterday, and I could write at length about it here, but Margaret Anne McHugh summarized it perfectly with this tweet:

Learned a lot about democracy yesterday. Halifax Board of Police Commissioners has no power – can only recommend …? Furey can. No one, it appears, except police, can be involved in the decision to buy an armoured vehicle, either. No meaningful civilian oversight.

— Margaret Anne, Solidarity! w/women in Iran (@ma_mchugh) April 16, 2019

And my apologies here… but I was just notified of a potential news story I have to attend to immediately, so this Tuesday’s Morning File is even suckier than most Tuesday Morning Files, which almost always suck.

2. SaltWire lawsuit

I stopped by the courthouse yesterday to have a look at SaltWire’s lawsuit against Transcontinental.

The lawsuit hasn’t been tested in court, so we’ll see how this plays out. But as I read through it, I was struck by both the seriousness of the allegations levelled against Transcontinental and by the apparent lack of even basic due diligence on the part of SaltWire.

It appears SaltWire accepted at face value the valuation of the Transcontinental assets it purchased as presented in a slide presentation that Transcontinenetal used as part of its sales presentation.

This car is the same colour and year as my 1966 Ford Falcon, but my car had a bunch of dents.

When I was a teenager, I was looking to buy my first car, a banged up 1966 Ford Falcon being sold by a young woman in desperate need of quick cash so she could move out of town. She was asking $1,000 for the car. I test drove it, and then took it by a mechanic and paid him 20 bucks to have a look-see. He said the car would probably be OK, but the woman was asking too much; “offer her $600,” he said, and I did, and she accepted. I drove that car for another four years before it crapped out.

That’s all to say it appears that 19-year-old dumbass Tim did more to investigate the true value of a banged up Ford Falcon than SaltWire did before purchasing 27 newspapers and four printing presses spread across three provinces.

In any event, the lawsuit makes serious allegations of misrepresentation on Transcontinental’s part.

The lawsuit claims that Transcontinental had inflated circulation figures to its customers, and so subsequently had to “remedy the wrongdoing by providing significant credits to customers for the non-existent circulation.” The customers didn’t learn of the misrepresentation until after the sale agreement with SaltWire.

Additionally, “SaltWire discovered that more than 141,00 flyer packages were not delivered by Transcontinental’s agent in Western Newfoundland [before the sale]. Significant damages have resulted from the requirement to clean-up those materials, and the need to compensate the client…”

There are other claims about assets not being worth what Transcontinental had stated, and then there’s a tax claim: SaltWire claims that Transcontinental had left it with an unpaid $1.7 million HST bill.

As I say, we’ll see how this plays out in the courts, but if the allegations are remotely true, I can’t help but thinking that Transcontinental simply saw Mark Lever as an easy mark.

You can read the lawsuit here.

3. SolarTron

YouTube video

Yesterday, at about 3:30pm, a company called SolarTron Energy Systems filed for bankruptcy.

SolarTron was a spinoff company from the long-established Amherst firm EG Energy Controls.

SolarTron built a “SolarBeam Concentrator,” a “parabolic reflector solar energy collector.” This seems like ancient technology to me (but of course, what do I know?); according to a technical paper published by the company:

The principal market for SolarBeam is heating contractors and solar installers worldwide. Sales expectations are to sell 40–60 SolarBeams in 2011, 150 in 2012, and 300 in 2013.

There’s nothing wrong with such devices, but I don’t see how you can patent geometry. Seems like the competition would be stiff.  Still, the company got the usual round of government funding, including a Nova Scotia Business Inc. (NSBI) loan of $250,000 in 2011 and two Atlantic Canadian Opportunity Agency (ACOA) loans — $229,600 in 2012 and $349,645 in 2015.

I emailed both agencies yesterday to see what the status of the loans is. It was late in the day, so I was surprised to get a response from NSBI spokesperson Mel Rusinak; she didn’t say what the outstanding debt on the loan was, but said NSBI is aware that SolarTron has filed for bankruptcy.

ACOA spokesperson Chris Brooks tried, but could not get back to me with the status of the ACOA loans by the end of the business day.

SolarTron is still profiled as a “success story” by the provincial Department of Energy.

4. Atlantec Bioenergy

Also yesterday, ACOA registered a judgment it had previously secured in a PEI court in Nova Scotia; the judgment is against a Nova Scotia firm called Atlantec Bioenergy.

Atlantec Bioenergy was originally called Agritech Ethanol, and in 2007 had tried to convince the PEI government to help fund a proposed ethanol plant in Cornwall, PEI; it would use sugar beets as the feed stock to produce ethanol. “However,” reported the Island Press, “a report commissioned by the province [of PEI] recommended against the plan and the company set up shop in Nova Scotia.”

The company rebranded as Atlantec Bioenergy with the aim of taking over the TrentonWorks factory in 2008, reported the CBC:

The company hopes to convince Nova Scotia farmers to produce 6,070 hectares of sugar beets, which would be converted into ethanol for sale to East Coast refineries.

The railcar plant in Trenton closed last year, putting 300 people out of work. Ernst and Young Inc., which has been hired to oversee the sale of the plant and its assets, has been looking for a buyer for months.

[Atlantec Bioenergy president Paul] Wheaton said the site is a prime location for the new venture.

“We have rail in Nova Scotia, we have water, we have the highway system and there’s more land here that’s available,” he said.

Wheaton said the ethanol plant would create 45 jobs and involve more than 100 farmers, and the federal government is providing a setup grant through Sustainable Development Technology Canada.

Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!

I can’t find the amount of the “setup grant” from Sustainable Development Technology Canada.

But for whatever reason, the TrentonWorks plan never proceeded, and in 2012 the company popped back up in PEI, landing “$1.8 million in grants, loans and labour rebates from the [PEI] provincial government and $340,000 from the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency” to build a “demonstration plant” in Cornwall:

Company executives were joined by Egmont MP and National Revenue Minister Gail Shea and Innovation Minister Allen Roach to unveil their plans at a recent news conference. Wheaton said during the news conference the company contracted with a grower in Savage Harbour to produce 50 acres of what he termed an “energy beet” The variety has been genetically modified to be resistant to Roundup and can be grown with a minimum amount of chemicals.

Instead of producing ethanol commercially, the company has a patent on the technology and hopes to sell it. The Cornwall plant, which is slated to come on stream early, next year, will exist largely to demonstrate the technology to potential customers. The company indicates they hope to employ 8-10 people immediately, increasing that to 25 within the first five years.

The PEI Green Party would have none of it:

Green Party Leader Sharon Labchuk said she was “shocked” the provincial and federal governments were supporting the proposal

“The same objections to this scheme still stand. We want to know why the Premier didn’t hold public meetings,” Labchuk said. “This company has made no secret of the fact they’re looking to grow sugar beets on an industrial scale in the Maritimes.”

She added it was “sneaky and underhanded” to spend our tax dollars this way when the Premier knows very well there has been significant opposition to ethanol and that Islanders are more interested than ever in supporting local organic food production over industrial monoculture crops.”

Besides the environmental issues, the company couldn’t make it financially. The original $340,512 ACOA loan extended in 2011 was amended to $444,154 in 2012, and in 2015 ACOA gave the company an additional grant of $50,000 to “hire a process engineer,” all to no avail. The company has gone belly-up, and ACOA registered a $262,125.28 claim against Atlantec Bioenergy in PEI, which has now been re-registered in Nova Scotia, at an additional cost of $697.60, added to the no-doubt uncollectible total.

Photo: Lancaster Online

Atlantec Bioenergy president Paul Wheaton resides in Lancaster Pennsylvania, where he is owner of Lancaster Propane Gas. In 2013, a rail car making a butane delivery to that company exploded, severely injuring a worker.

Atlantec Bioenergy was part of a larger government push to produce a bioenergy industry in the Maritimes, which would primarily be focused not on sugar beets but on forest products.

“While province by province challenges exist, interest in the use of biomass for heat/combined heat/power and electricity generation is of interest across the region,” reads a 2012 report produced for ACOA:

The forest industry is a significant regional employer. Environmentally sustainable development of biomass and related products holds the potential to offset challenges in the global pulp and paper industry that are affecting Atlantic Canada.

Bioenergy is a component of the PEI’s Renewable Energy Initiative, and a similar program exists in NS. Researchers at UPEI and the PEI Departments of Agriculture and Forestry along with private research companies (e.g. Atlantec BioEnergy) could collaborate with NB and NS researchers on the concept of bio-refineries.

The misguided pursuit of biofuels was the subject of Linda Pannozzo’s article “Life After Pulp.”




City council (Tuesday, 10am, City Hall) — here’s the agenda.


Audit and Finance Standing Committee (Wednesday, 10am, City Hall) — nothing on the agenda jumps out at me as terribly interesting.

Community Design Advisory Committee (Wednesday, 11:30am, City Hall) — planners are still pretending that the politicians will abide by plans.


No public meetings this week.

On campus



Sanofi Biogenius Canada Regional Competition (Tuesday, 9am, Tupper Building Foyer) — “fosters young minds and talent by challenging participants to carry out groundbreaking biotechnology research.” Info on Twitter and the website.

Board of Governors Meeting (Tuesday, 3pm, University Hall, Macdonald Building) — agenda


Avoiding Predatory Publishers Webinar (Wednesday, 12pm, online only) — Melissa Rothfus will explain the obvious. Register here to receive webinar link.

An Introduction to Health Economics for Nursing and Health Research (Wednesday, 12pm, Room 112, Forrest Building) — PhD candidate Tim Disher will talk. Option to join remotely. Contact this person.

Thesis Defence, Psychology and Neuroscience (Wednesday, 1pm, Room 3107, Mona Campbell Building) — PhD candidate Kristen Higgins will defend “Child Outcomes in the Context of Parental Chronic Pain: Examining Social Transmission Pathways.”

Residential Tenancies – The Basics and Beyond (Wednesday, 7pm, Room 104, Weldon Law Building) — Megan Deveaux will discuss the amendments that were made last year to Nova Scotia’s Residential Tenancies Act, and answer questions from the audience about the legal rights and responsibilities of both landlords and tenants in residential rental situations in the province.

In the harbour

05:00: Budapest Bridge, container ship, arrives at Fairview Cove from New York
06:30: Elka Sirius, oil tanker, sails from Irving Oil for sea
06:30: East Coast, oil tanker, moves from anchorage to Irving Oil
11:00: Columbia Highway, car carrier, sails from Autoport for sea
12:30: Bishu Highway, car carrier, arrives at Autoport from Southampton, England
16:00: Budapest Bridge, container ship, sails for Rotterdam
18:00: Horizon Star, offshore supply ship, sails from Dartmouth Cove for the offshore


Busy day today. I’ll try to get to council, but I have a couple of other projects that need my attention as well, so I’m not sure I can get to City Hall.

The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Tim Bousquet is the editor and publisher of the Halifax Examiner. Twitter @Tim_Bousquet Mastodon

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. OK – I think the Commissioners on the Police Board, especially city councillors may protest too much. Just read the act and the By-law that governs the commission and from where they derive their powers. It is the City By-law that is limiting their powers from what I can see and not the Police Act as they were claiming yesterday! By-law says: “prepare and submit in consultation with the Chief of Police and the Chief Administrative Officer or delegate, to Council an annual
    budget for the municipal police service. The municipal council shall
    only exercise global budget approval and shall only accept the
    police service budget submitted to it by the board or refer back to
    the board with instructions that it be altered upward or downward
    by a specific dollar amount or percentage;” SO they can only do it via percentage as I said in reply to Colin May above. and yet Commissioner claimed that they do not get to determine detail of police budget, and this by-law limits councillor ability to question any detail.

    1. Whatever is the “truth”, I do believe the perception is that the police do whatever the hell they want to.

    2. The Board is solely responsible for the budget, full stop. The bylaw governing the Board requires provincial approval by the minister of justice. The Police Act defines the powers of the Board. The council is not responsible for policing, it is responsible for providing the funds to the police department and the Board determines how the money is spent .
      Councillor Smith failed to attend the December 17 1918 Board meeting where the police budget was first discussed. Commissioner Thomas also failed to attend the meeting. Minutes here :
      The budget was once again before the Board on February 5 2019. Commissioner Carlos Beals and Commissioner Thomas failed to attend the meeting. An amended budget was approved.
      If an armoured vehicle was approved in the budget and the budget was then approved by Regional council the blame/praise belongs to the members of the Board of Police Commissioners. I suggest you contact Craig,Mancini, and Smith and ask them if the vehicle was in the budget. I attended the Board meetings when the budget was discussed and the Council meting when Commissioner Craig presented the budget to Council abd there was no discuission regarding police vehicles.
      Minutes of Board meetings don’t record why a member does not attend and does not record the time a member leaves before the agenda is completed and does not record the late arrival of a member.
      Nova Scotia is the only jurisdiction where the CAO is allowed to attend meetings of the police Board and the only jurisdiction where a an organiztion chart shows a police chief reporting to a Board of Police Commissioners and the CAO.

  2. “The lawsuit claims that Transcontinental had inflated circulation figures to its customers.”

    I’m assuming the customers are advertisers. Circulation is usually verified by third parties, to which advertisers would or could have access.

  3. Ms McHugh is wrong. The Police Department can only spend money approved by the Board of Police Commissioners and HRM council.
    No police Board can tell a Chief of Police how to carry out her/his responsibilities.
    I fully expect a new Chief of Police to carefully consider the unanimous motion of the Board and implement any decisions made by the Minister of Justice.
    The Herald ran an article several days ago regarding the two Toronto police officers who are possible front runners for HRM Chief of Police. According to public records both women were Staff Sergeant from 2010 – 2013. In 2014 both women were promoted to Inspector. In 2015 one became Superintendent and then Deputy Chief in 2017; the other woman remains an Inspector.
    Once again the provincial appointee to the Board failed to attend the meeting. Since being sworn in on June 18 2018 Commissioner Thomas has attended just 4 of 12 meetings. As this is Nova Scotia I doubt any action will be taken, nothing happenend to the previous provincial appointee who had a similar dismal record of attendance.

    1. The Board of Police Commissioners does NOT have any control over the Police budget. Or so we were told yesterday. Perhaps they lied but certainly feel possibly mislead – or maybe they have power that they historically have not used. BUt here’s what I understand — I spoke to City Councillor Tony Mancini afterward, (as he asked some very pointed questions about the armoured vehicle that resulted in – they can do nothing about it) who said – that they do not even have control over the police budget as city councillors – they are not allowed to say – “you cannot spend this money on. . .” they can only send it back and tell them to reduce it by 5, 10% or whatever. Anything else is considered “interfering with police operations”. The City “fleet budget” is the same according to Mancini – they can send it back and tell them to reduce it but cannot set the priorities for what police spend that budget on. So no one can stop the police (they claim with certainty) from spending their allocated budget however they want. I was shocked and am in “investigation mode” myself being absolutely appalled about the budget and lack of control and civilian oversight — when it comes to policing. There appears to be, in fact, no police civilian oversight – except to collect data and “make recommendations”. The Police Act directs the Board — “the board shall not exercise jurisdiction relating to
      complaints, discipline or personnel conduct except in
      respect of the chief officer of the municipal police department;
      a specific prosecution or investigation; or
      the actual day-to-day direction of the police department.”

      (e) is what causes the problems. I was told that the Board does not review the budget – but you are correct – it is in their mandate. Perhaps since they can review but not direct they just don’t bother? Looking into it as a active citizen!

  4. “We have rail in Nova Scotia, we have water, we have the highway system and there’s more land here that’s available,” he said.

    This could apply to pretty much anywhere, no?