In the harbour


1. Bullshitter of the Summer: Randy Delorey

Randy Delorey
Randy Delorey

Finance Minister Randy Delorey met with union leaders yesterday to present to them what he characterized as a “new approach” to labour negotiations.

As I’ve previously written, it has been rumoured that the Liberal government was going to try to impose a three-year wage freeze on union members. But it’s even worse than that: Delorey has proposed a five-year wage freeze.

In real terms, if inflation runs at two per cent a year, a five-year wage freeze amounts to a 10.5 per cent pay cut by the end of the five years.

Delorey presented the wage freeze via a PowerPoint presentation. You can see the entire presentation here.

This wins Delorey the Bullshitter of the Summer Award for lots of reasons. Let’s start first with the absurd neoliberal position that paying everyone less will make everyone richer. We have a consumer-driven economy: when public sector employees who live and work in the community get paid, they mostly spend that pay here in the province, buying goods and services that result in other people getting paid to provide those goods and services. Cut the public employees’ pay, and they have less money to spend buying goods and services, which means that there’s less money available to hire people to provide those goods and services.

But what about the taxpayer? In some theoretical world, reducing public employees’  pay means cutting government costs, which translates into lower tax bills for the average person, so everyone in Nova Scotia will have more after-tax money in pocket, which they will then spend on goods and services, which results in even more economic activity, and so more people hired to provide those goods and services, than if the public employees were getting the money.

That’s a perfectly good argument. Welcome to our shores, stranger. Perhaps you’d also like to buy the Macdonald Bridge from me, for a mere $200. No, no, the brown bills, not the green ones.

In reality, cutting public employee pay does not result in reduced taxes. Well, sure, the Liberals want to reduce taxes — just not for you. Laurel Broten’s tax recommendation was to reduce taxes on “risk-takers, dreamers, doers, and builders.” Who are they? Well, it ain’t you. It’s people in the self-congratulatory circle jerk of big money, who aren’t spending their riches at the local corner store but are rather parking their dough in hedge funds managed in the tax-avoidance Cayman Islands and finding other opportunities for rent-seeking. Under Broten’s proposal, normal, everyday people will see their taxes go up, not down, through increased sales taxes and the like.

Broten’s proposals were shelved because they were too transparently honest. But her proposals fit well within the neoliberal policy aims of the Liberal government. Unless there is continued political resistance, we’ll see each of her proposals implemented over time.

But, again, the premise is bullshit. As I’ve written before:

First of all, “dreamers” and rich people don’t “create jobs.” You know who creates jobs? Customers. Regular people with everyday jobs who have cash to spend. It’s that cash that “risk-takers” figure out how to appeal to and “build” their fortunes on. That’s why we need good-paying, union-protected jobs for as many workers as possible: because those workers are the bedrock of the economy. Without them, our economy is a race to the bottom, as we rely increasingly on ever-lower paying jobs in whatever slave-labour hellhole we can find them in, and loot the collective social wealth that took decades and centuries to accumulate.

The aim to cut public employee wages is part of a larger project to shift wealth into the hands of a tinier and tinier group of people. Understand that and you can understand pretty much everything about our politics today. It’s the politics of looting, as the one per cent steal everything that isn’t tied down, and untie everything else.

As an aside, imagine if the politicians of the past had the ideology of our present political class. Imagine them saying government is bad, public employees are the root of all evil, we can’t possibly afford any increases in government expenditures, and so forth. We’d have no Medicare. We’d have no highways. We’d have none of the public works that provide the foundation for our economy, which is still one of the wealthiest the planet has ever seen — much wealthier today than when our country was being built. They could find the money for important public projects then, and we can find the money for important public projects now.

Second, the particulars of Delorey’s presentation pretty much are bullshit defined. He has a “desire to move towards collaboration,” and expresses that collaborative spirit by dictating a wage freeze before negotiations even begin.

Then there’s this:

Recognition that the members represented by labour leaders are our employees who provide public services, but also citizens who consume those same services and taxpayers who pay for them – representing the whole person.

See, public employees, Delory cares about your whole person, your entire being, not like those nasty union leaders who only care about your paycheque. Delorey is thinking about your chakras, your energy flow, the balance of your mind and spirit. He’s like the Dalai Lama, sort of, if the Dalai Lama wanted to cut your pay.

Delorey’s specific proposal is to freeze the total amount spent on employee compensation for each of the next five years. But, he says, that doesn’t mean there can’t be pay increases:

Funding for compensation increases, over the amounts set out in the fiscal plan, may come from budgeted and achieved cost reduction, budgeted and achieved cost avoidance, service redesign or other efficiency initiatives (Savings must be real, measurable, and achieved before being allocated to compensation increases)

And who will find those cost reductions, cost avoidances, service redesigns and efficiencies? The unions. This is an utter abandonment of managerial responsibility — the Liberals are throwing up their hands and saying, “fuck it, we don’t know how to save money, it’s up to you guys.” Moreover, it’s a bald attempt to destroy union solidarity, to pit public employees against one another. Workers over in Department A can get raises, but only if they figure out a way to get workers over in Department B fired.

Delorey could have proposed that union wages be capped in the sense that total compensation would not rise faster than inflation. That too would be problematic (any individual person’s wages should increase more than inflation as they move up the job market, acquiring more skills and experience), but it would at least make sense to the broad public. But no, rather try to find a sensible common ground, he’s declared war on labour in Nova Scotia, and he wrapped his justifications for war in one big stinking pile of bullshit.

Don’t expect the unions to take this lying down. This province is about to explode.

2. Reg Rankin

Reg Rankin. Photo: Halifax Examiner
Reg Rankin. Photo: Halifax Examiner

Impaired driving charges against Halifax councillor Reg Rankin have been dropped, reports the CBC. In March, 2014, in a snowstorm, Rankin drove his car into his porch. RCMP officers arrived at the scene and charged Rankin with impaired driving and failing a breathalyzer test.

But no worries, the charges have been dropped because, well, because he’s not some stupid kid or a brown person or Joe Sixpack, and no we don’t have two systems of justice, one for connected people and one for peons like you SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP.


I kid. Of course the true facts of the situation, as carefully elicited by legal counsel and wisely considered by a learned officer of the court, dictated that justice is best served by ending the matter and moving on.

But don’t try this at your home, kiddies.

Rankin has been fortunate, and I mean this, to be in a public position that has allowed him to take not one, but two, paid leaves of absence to attend to personal medical issues after being involved in alcohol-related incidents. Such benefits should be available to everyone.


1.  Mother Africa

Photo: Stephen Archibald
Photo: Stephen Archibald

Stephen Archibald recently stopped by Portsmouth, New Hampshire and, as is his wont, explored the town. Besides all the architectural wonders, Archibald discovered the African Burying Ground Memorial.:

Seems that a burying ground for early black (enslaved) residents of Portsmouth had been “lost” and eventually paved over. It was rediscovered a few year ago and the community worked to create a fitting memorial. To us it felt like a great success.


At the upper entrance to the site a male figure stands pressed against a granite slab.

Somehow I knew to look behind the slab and discovered a female figure. Flowers had be placed in her hand.

Then I realized the figures were reaching for each other, but there was a poignant and  painful separation.


When I checked the website for the Portsmouth African Burying Ground it turns out that the female figure represents Mother Africa! Mother Canada could learn a lot from her. For example, the impact of facing the gaze of a life sized sculpture, and the power of a nuanced gesture.

Be sure to check out all of Archibald’s photos.

2.Cranky letter of the day

To the Cape Breton Post:

A recent tourist to this island embarrassed me when he correctly said, “It’s a beautiful island but everywhere I went this week I saw garbage on the side of the roads, mostly coffee cups.” 

We live on an island where there are two different groups of residents. One group will go out of their way to put trash in the can and the other group never puts a thing in the trash can. It is sad to acknowledge, but it’s very true.

I have had to take an empty garbage bag and pick up along the side of the road in front of my house often and I have become desensitized to the trash I see daily. It took a visitor to make it clear to me again on how embarrassing this is to our island. What is wrong with Cape Bretoners when we allow this to go uncontested?  What kind of people live here that think it’s OK to just throw garbage out the window of their automobiles and let it blow down the street?  

The government road signs that state there is a $250 fine for littering is a joke because we all know they don’t enforce it. That is one reason people do litter. CBRM should have all fast food outlets that supply the cups that are on our roadside, charge 5 cents a cup to apply towards a salary for one plain clothes litter enforcement officer who has the power to issue fines and also cleans up. The fines alone could pay for that salary. Also fine people who fail to clean up in front of their own property within 48 hours. They will get tired of picking up and this will create a state of community watch on the problem.

Terrance MacDonald, Howie Centre


No public meetings. The scheduled meeting of the city’s Halifax Explosion 100th Anniversary Advisory Committee has been cancelled. I still think that thing’s going off the rails

In the harbour

The seas off Nova Scotia, 8:40am Wednesday. Map:
The seas off Nova Scotia, 8:40am Wednesday. Map:

Nolhanava, ro-ro cargo, arrived at Pier 36 from Saint-Pierre this morning
Atlantic Heron, bulker, Charlottetown to National Gypsum
Yantian Express, container ship, Port Said, Egypt to Fairview Cove
Atlantic Concert, ro-ro container, New York to Fairview Cove, then sails to sea
Oakland Express, container ship, New York to Fairview Cove

East Coast sailed to Charlottetown this morning
Budapest Express sails to sea


I’ll be on The Sheldon MacLeod Show, News 95.7, at 4pm.

Tim Bousquet is the editor and publisher of the Halifax Examiner. Twitter @Tim_Bousquet Mastodon

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. Collaboration and shared sacrifice.

    Hhhhhmmmmmm, RBC gets $22 million, former University exec gets $500,000 per year for sitting on his ass, Irving oil gets $200 million fron the province and millions from the city. Oh and everyone’s favourite Robert Risley. How much did he pocket from the taxpayers so he could paint his 3000 foot yacht?

    Who’s not collaborating? Who’s not sacrificing?

    Oh hang on! Those are the doers, dreamers and risk takers. My apologizes, I will go back to eating my gruel.

  2. The public sector unions have been silent about the cutbacks to social service recipients.
    Not a peep from Jessome et al regarding the withdrawal of free bus passes for those with less than 12 medical appointments a month.
    Not a peep about the miserly allowances for those forced to live in slums.
    I remember the days when the security of a public sector job and a pension were provided in exchange for lower pay than those employed in the private sector.
    As for inflation, heating oil is down 30 cents a litre, gas is no longer $1.49 a litre and March break trips to Cuba are about the same price.

    1. “I remember the days when the security of a public sector job and a pension were provided in exchange for lower pay than those employed in the private sector.”

      Shows how much the private sector has become so top heavy if their level of pay has dropped so much.
      It’s all about the top.
      Wasn’t like that years ago.

      1. A weird response.
        People who seek security usually realise that a price is attached to obtaining security.
        Example, life insurance : If your family had a history of early death from heart attacks would you pay the premiums or take your chances ?
        If you start a business and risk your own money should you reap the reward of success or share it with your friends who didn’t accept the offer to invest ? If it fails should government refund your investment ?
        Utilities are essential to our daily life and that is why they are given a regulated rate of return. Your internet provider, grocery store, restaurant, bar are not essential and are not guaranteed a rate of return.
        Perhaps you would prefer all employees be guaranteed a lifetime of work and employers given guaranteed rates of return in a regulated market.

  3. For those who don’t know, the vast majority of public servants have no right to strike (unlike healthcare and teacher unions), so while there may be protests, a wage freeze will probably be implemented with a whimper rather than a bang on that front. Healthcare will put up a fight though, unless they get legislated out of the fray.

    Minister Delorey was a pretty reasonable guy as Minister of Environment, but he is obviously toeing the party line here. I doubt he’s got much say in what he has to do. Unfortunate but true in the current environment.

    What’s more interesting to me is the assertion that union members can find savings. For the most part, they have no say in how things operate these days since managers and senior exec barely listen to their staff (if they did, you might actually see some changes and improvements). Like it or not, you need ideas from all levels of the organization and trust from both sides to get things done.

    This is not the way to go about it.

  4. Bullshitter of the Summer:
    The union will likely take this lying down and spread-eagled. Just like they did for the IBM thing; the union execs were approached before any union workers had an IBM inkling and were asked/told not to say anything to its affected membership. Being gagged is the union’s thing and once you start you can’t resist doing it again.

  5. Litter drives me bonkers. Back when I was in university, I was waiting at a red light at the Willow Tree intersection. The driver of the car in front of me threw the box from an empty pack of smokes out the window. I put my car in neutral, got out of the car, and walked up to his open window, where he was puffing away with his wife and kids in the car. I picked up the discarded package, said ‘the street isn’t a garbage can, asshole’ and threw it in his lap. His kids’ and wife’s eyes were huge. The light turned green, he squealed out of there, and I went back to my car.

    I hope he put it in garbage can after that, but I have my doubts.

    1. I still don’t understand why cigarette butts get a pass on the whole “litter” thing. Maybe it goes back to pre-filter days, when the butts were truly organic.

      1. There’s no where to put them. I work at Scotia Square and people (including me) smoke at the corner of Duke and Barrington. There used to be a place for your butts but they took it away and now there’s always a bunch of butts on the pavement. They do have someone come out and sweep a few times a day. They should have the pole type ashtray, or ones like at the WTTC attached to the building.

        1. Since sidewalks don’t grow cigarettes, “no where to put them” is not at all an excuse. Its smaller than what with you started when you went out to smoke. Pack it in, pack it out.

  6. and…. great article on the Portsmouth memorial. poignant and deeply moving. our proposed ‘mother canada’ is so crass in comparison.

  7. if we don’t pick up litter because someone else produced it, it will just sit there. you don’t pick it up to help the idiots who threw it, you pick it up because it’s the right thing to do. some people will continue to litter no matter what. community, family and friends speaking up when you see a person you know toss anything would help.

  8. Thanks for writing about the things you write about Tim. It’s a really healthy thing for all of us. I hope Reg can stick to whatever recovery plan he’s on.

  9. I have often wondered whether those NS highways “patrolled by aircraft” or whatever the signs say, are really patrolled by air?

  10. THUMBS UP, TERENCE MACDONALD! The trash-throwers are not only sneaky but prolific. I’ve been lobbying for years to get a DEPOSIT on the hundreds of tons of fast-food overpackaging and non-biodegradable trash the «Fast Food» purveyors push out their polluting drive-thru windows. At the stroke of a pen they could be required to charge a sufficient amount to cover cleaning up THEIR trash, with, hopefully enough surplus money to employ, as Terence said, some «Plain Clothes Enforcement Officers». A few well-publicised fines would do wonders particularly if the paltry $250 was brought into line with other Provincial fines for far less egregious offences — how about $1,500 for a first offence, and double for repeaters.

    Finally, we need to SHAME the FastFood and JunkFood scourges into cleaning up THEIR messes. That’s why I refuse to participate in «Cleanup Days». 98% of what is «cleaned-up» is clearly identifiable as coming from one of a half-dozen FastFood BIG POLLUTERS.

    1. I wasn’t at the courthouse so I don’t know the particulars of Rankin’s case, but typically the crown doesn’t say why they don’t proceed with a prosecution.

      1. I heard from a friend that the Crown did not bring corroborative evidence with them to court to substantiate the breathalyzer test results… if true, that would be what is known as a major OOPS, eh?