(Clockwise from top left) Federal Families, Children and Social Development Minister Ahmed Hussen, Nova Scotia Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Chuck Porter, Halifax Mayor Mike Savage, and Halifax West MP Geoff Regan pose for a photo opp following a virtual news conference on Monday. Credit: Contributed

With great fanfare and little detail, the provincial government announced on Monday that it will spend $1.8 million over 20 years, supposedly to cover the municipality’s expected share of operating costs for more than 50 units of federally-funded affordable housing.

The federal government announced the $1 billion Rapid Housing Initiative in October. Half the money went directly to major cities, including Halifax, which received about $8.7 million.

Halifax regional council voted last month to direct the money to three nonprofits to create 52 units of affordable housing within the next year. The Mi’kmaw Native Friendship Centre, Adsum Women and Children, and the North End Community Health Centre will share $8,083,213 from initiative, with Halifax holding onto $576,314 for contingency.

During a virtual news conference held via Zoom on Monday, Federal Families, Children and Social Development Minister Ahmed Hussen, Nova Scotia Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Chuck Porter, Halifax Mayor Mike Savage, and Halifax West MP Geoff Regan re-announced the federal funding, confirming the city’s proposal was accepted.

But Porter also announced $1.8 million in new provincial funding “to help with the operations over the next number of years.” In a news release, the province said it will “contribute more than $1.8 million to help ensure three projects are sustainable over the long term.”

Savage said Porter’s “willingness to jump in and provide provincial support on this project made the project much more manageable.”

Municipal chief administrative officer Jacques Dubé alluded to the funding during a council debate last week.

“You’ll recall that the Province of Nova Scotia committed to cover any deficits for the three projects that council supported under the major cities stream,” Dubé told councillors. “That was an estimated $1.8 million over 20 years.”

When the Halifax Examiner asked for more details during the news conference, neither Savage or Porter had them.

“One of the issues that government has always been pretty good at is giving money to build something and then not so good sometimes at taking care of it,” Savage said.

“We could not have allocated this $8.6 million if we didn’t have an arrangement with the provincial government where the provincial government would support ongoing operations, which Minister Porter can speak to.”

Porter said the $1.8 million would be used for operations over the next 20 years — the minimum time the three nonprofits are required to keep their units affordable under the Rapid Housing Initiative. As a comparison, the provincial government just granted two nonprofits $1.7 million to operate 40 shelter beds for one year.

“It is always the long-term maintenance of operations that cause us the most concern,” Porter said.

The Halifax Examiner asked the spokesperson for the Department of Municipal Affairs and Housing for more detail. We’ll update this post when we get it.*

But in an interview with the Examiner, Sheri Lecker, executive director of Adsum Women and Children, said the money goes to the city, not to the nonprofits. Lecker wasn’t told about the funding before Monday’s announcement, but sought details from the province afterward.

“The money that was announced by the province is to go to the city for the city to cover shortfalls or gaps over the coming 20 years if the operating expenses for all the new housing units that come online, if the rents are so low that they don’t actually cover the operating costs,” Lecker said.

“And that $1.8 million is for 20 years.”

Evenly split, that’s $30,000 a year for each of the three projects.

Lecker said as part of its submission for the funding, Adsum built a budget based around rents, inclusive of heat and utilities, equal to 30% of provincial income assistance rates. Those rates haven’t seen a meaningful increase in more than 20 years, and they’ve actually gone down when inflation is factored in.

Adsum is building three-bedroom units as part of its project under the Rapid Housing Initiative. They’ll rent to people on income assistance for $357 — heat and utilities included.

Not all of the tenants will be on income assistance, but none of them will pay much rent. As another example, Lecker said seniors receiving their Canada Pension Plan, CPP, might get $900 a month total. Adsum would charge them $270 for rent.

All those low rates mean Adsum will be operating at a deficit — and under the Rapid Housing Initiative agreement, the municipality will have to cover it.

“We are showing a loss every year,” Lecker said. “And so you could say, will this $1.8 million, divided by three organizations, cover that loss? And I would say, ‘Yeah, but there are a ton of things that aren’t here.’ There’s no staffing … Nobody else would be expected to model their housing this way.”

In building the budget for the new housing over the next five years, Adsum wasn’t able to include the cost of its support staff and factored in a smaller than usual reserve fund.

The province could change this situation.

“The only reason the deficits exist is they will not raise the amount that people can spend to live in dignity,” Lecker said.

“They could affect the change not just for us and our projects, but for everyone else who has to struggle and try to subsist on income assistance rates.”

*Update: In an email on Monday, Municipal Affairs and Housing spokesperson Krista Higdon wrote:

“$1 million is going to HRM to be used to support operations over 20 years for Adsum and the North End Community Centre RHI projects. The Mi’kmaw Native Friendship Centre will receive $832,000, via HRM, to support capital costs of their Rapid Housing Initiative project.”

The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Some people have asked that we additionally allow for one-time donations from readers, so we’ve created that opportunity, via the PayPal button below. We also accept e-transfers, cheques, and donations with your credit card; please contact iris “at” halifaxexaminer “dot” ca for details.

Thank you!

Zane Woodford is the Halifax Examiner’s municipal reporter. He covers Halifax City Hall and contributes to our ongoing PRICED OUT housing series. Twitter @zwoodford

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
  1. That’s a useful comparison to make, that being HRM’s housing needs vs. the deficit on the Convention Centre. The math on 30% household income obviously creates operating risk when the income assistance rate for a single individual is $586 per month. Since HRM was provided the $8.7M for rapid housing by CMHC and now has the Province covering the operating risk, what is HRM’s actual commitment? The only thing I can think of is waiving the building permit and other ancillary fees, but excluding Hfx Water exorbitant connection fees of course.

  2. A pittance compared with the $25 million for bike lanes. ” Halifax and Dartmouth cyclists will see more protected bikeways in the next three years thanks to a multimillion-dollar project funded by the municipality and provincial and federal government.
    The three levels of government committed a combined total of $25 million to complete a 30-kilometre system of bicycle and pedestrian pathways on both sides of the harbour.”

    Double income white public sector dependent people are more important than housing for single mothers and the poor.

    1. Go out to Spryfield and tell me that bike lanes don’t help people living in poverty. I can think of a lot of subsidies that are exclusively available to rich people, but investment in biking is not one of them.