Peter Moreira is paid by government agencies to promote the companies he writes about in his Chronicle Herald column.
Peter Moreira is “partners” with government economic development agencies that fund the companies he writes about in his Chronicle Herald column.
Peter Moreira is “partners” with government economic development agencies that fund the companies he writes about in his Chronicle Herald column.

By publishing a business column without revealing the financial interests the columnist has with the companies he writes about, the Chronicle Herald is in clear violation of widely accepted ethical rules in journalism.

Peter Moreira writes the “Entrevestor” column for the Chronicle Herald. The column appears three times a week, and profiles start up companies. Moreira also owns a company of the same name, and the website entrevestor.com. The website is “partners” with various public economic development agencies—ACOA, NSBI, Innovacorp, and the equivalents in New Brunswick and Newfoundland—and the site promotes the start ups the agencies fund. Some of the start ups also hire Moreira as a writer, to write their business cases and promotional material. The Chronicle Herald also pays him for the column.

In his column, Moreira writes about companies funded by the economic development agencies, and always positively. He never critically examines the agencies or the companies. So far as I can determine, the column has never profiled a company that is not funded by the agencies Moreira “partners” with.

I had a pleasant email exchange with Moreira yesterday about this, and he told me that “you raise a fair point, a legitimate concern to use your phrase. It’s something that I’ve wrestled with since I started Entrevestor.”

Moreira is a true believer in start ups. In 2009 he wrote a book, Backwater: Nova Scotia’s economic decline, which appears to be (I haven’t read it) a call to double down on neoliberal policy in the Maritimes, slashing corporate taxes, cutting regulations, etc. Since then, he’s developed a niche for himself, paradoxically working with the very governments he so despises. He explains:

As well as some private sector sponsors, the Entrevestor website is sponsored by five government entities – ACOA, NSBI, Innovacorp, NBIF and the NL government.  (We have to use the term “partner” because “sponsor” became an unpopular term in government after the sponsorship scandal. For all intents and purposes, partner and sponsor are synonymous.) I place their logos on our homepage so everyone sees who sponsors our site. Some of these agencies also advertise in our quarterly print publication – an advertising relationship that is no different than any other publication. Sponsorship of the website has become an increasingly smaller portion of our income each year. Advertising and the sale of data comprise the majority of our business now.

Moreira goes on to say that “I honestly believe the tone and substance of Entrevestor would be unchanged if we didn’t have government sponsors.”

Fair enough. I’ll discuss Moreira’s ideas and how he fits into our political culture in a future post, but right now I want to talk about the Chronicle Herald’s ethical lapse.

The Chronicle Herald does label the column “Entrevestor,” and its author’s note for Moreira explains that “Peter Moreira is a principal of www.entrevestor.com, a news and data website for Atlantic Canadian startups.” What the Chronicle Herald does not do, however, is clearly and explicitly tell its readers that Moreira benefits financially by promoting the companies he is writing about.

By not clearly declaring the payments Moreira receives from the agencies, the Chronicle Herald is violating basic and long-standing journalistic conflict of interest policies.

The New York Time’s conflict of interest statement, for example, says that:

The goal of The New York Times is to cover the news as impartially as possible — “without fear or favor,” in the words of Adolph Ochs, our patriarch — and to treat readers, news sources, advertisers and others fairly and openly, and to be seen to be doing so. The reputation of The Times rests upon such perceptions, and so do the professional reputations of its staff members. Thus The Times and members of its news department and editorial page staff share an interest in avoiding conflicts of interest or an appearance of a conflict.

The Times’ “Ethical Journalism” handbook makes plain that:

Staff members may not accept anything that could be construed as a payment for favorable coverage or as an inducement to alter or forgo unfavorable coverage.  

In its “Statement of Principles,” Newspapers Canada, the industry group that represents daily and community newspapers in Canada, directly addresses conflicts of interest:

The newspaper’s primary obligation is fidelity to the public good. It should pay the costs of gathering the news. Conflicts of interest, real or apparent, should be declared. The newspaper should guard its independence from government, commercial and other interests seeking to subvert content for their own purposes.

Why does this matter? Because readers are being misled into thinking that Moreira’s columns are an independent look at start ups.

It’s true that the columns are clearly labeled “Entrevestor,” but will the average reader knows what that means? Even going to the entrevestor.com website (which most readers won’t do) finds only a list of “partners,” but again, what does that mean? I had to ask Moreira and the economic development agencies to explain it to me. NSBI told me the agency has paid Moreira $24,500 since 2011, or about $8,200 over each of the three years. Innovacorp said they’ve paid $3,000 annually to “partner” with entrevestor.com, but also an additional $2,250 to advertise in each of Moreira’s biannual “Intelligence Reports.” As of publishing this post, ACOA hasn’t yet responded to my query.

The columns have the appearance of falling behind the editorial/advertising fire wall, and with no indication otherwise, readers will assume that Moreira has no monetary interest in portraying the companies in a certain light. This is incorrect. Agree with him or not, but I’ve never seen him critically question a start-up, or the agencies that fund them, which one would expect occasionally from a unaffiliated commentator. Further: so far as I know, in his Chronicle Herald column, Moreira has never written about a company that he wasn’t also getting paid by the economic development agencies to promote.

Via email, this morning I asked Chronicle Herald associate publisher Ian Thompson about Moreira’s conflict of interest. This afternoon, Thompson emailed back to say he’ll have an answer for me—but probably not until Friday.

There’s much more to say about this. I’ve asked a couple of journalism profs who study and write about conflicts of interest to weigh in, and I’ll publish their and Thompson’s responses when I get them. Additionally, there are issues related to how advertising skews and slants news coverage, which I want to explore at length.

Tim Bousquet

Tim Bousquet is the editor and publisher of the Halifax Examiner. Twitter @Tim_Bousquet Mastodon

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
Cancel reply
  1. You touch on this briefly, but another element of this little circle of conflict is that, as I understand it, Mr. Moreira also produces reports on the state of the startup industry in the region. I have heard him interviewed on the subject, but did not realize that he is directly involved with some of the businesses he was discussing.

  2. Love it. So happy to hear others feel the same way. Bousquet uncovers what I knew was happening but no-one put print to it. We need more of this. Drag NS into the modern world of journalism.

  3. Yup, this is, for me, one of the reasons I signed up with HfxEx; keep it coming Tim and never hold back!

  4. I’m not sure it’s possible to overestimate the importance of Tim Bousquet’s voice in our community especially when it comes to business coverage.

    There seems to be such a irrational fear of upsetting the small elite in this community for fear of losing jobs or investment that we don’t question those very same people who make lots of money by being bold and taking millions of dollars in handouts from the public purse and then having the audacity to decry government mismanagement and high taxes.

    Keep up this much needed work Mr Bousquet. Would it be too cheeky to nominate the Halifax Examiner as start up of the year?

  5. Wow! What a shock…private sector, public sector, journalism (sic) all in bed together. Just to be clear, I’m not shocked. Tim, don’t expect The Herald to do anything but ignore this little inconvenient truth. Who besides you is going to call them out. This sort of thing is in the culture of this “news” organization. Why do you think Bill Spurr has no problem collecting a fee for his so called restaurant reviews and then charging the restaurants to post the reviews on their web sites.
    Keep up the good work and let’s hope the story gets wider attention beyond your subscription base. It would be great if the local CBC picked it up and Stephanie Domet had a shot at interviewing this guy. She’s done some great interviews lately and I think she would eat Moreira for lunch.

  6. I sound parrot-like here but I whole-heartedly agree that pieces like this are why I signed up. Although I believe in obtaining news from various sources, to get a balanced view, yours is the only news source I read to keep in touch with what is happening in Halifax, because there just isn’t another. As the paper of record, the Herald should be another option, but not with this loosey goosey “ethics”. I am looking forward to the responses as well.
    Thanks,
    Liz

  7. Gag response. Some journalism! It doesn’t deserve the term.

    Haven’t fraction of doubt Moreira would still be “wrestling with” the conflict if not for your investigation and exposé.

    And days for the Herald publisher to provide an explanation? Absurd.

  8. Not surprising considering the way the CH has approached the Nova centre. Full page ad and firebrand editorials saying the same thing – not impartial at all. But I guess, in a market this small if you’re dependent on ads for revenue then you don’t want to piss off the very small patriarchal elite who control the east coast. That’s why I pay for your site.

  9. nuggets/revelations that I would otherwise never know are important, singularly and collectively

    most of us have rose coloured glasses as we go about our daily lives………its time for each of us, to examine and demand better…….clarity , truth should always be the standard in journalism