A rendering of Homes for Heroes’ tiny home village in Calgary, completed last year. Credit: Contributed

A proposal for tiny homes could lead to some big changes in the way Halifax supports non-profits and charities building affordable housing in the municipality.

The Homes For Heroes Foundation is an Alberta-based charity that builds clusters of tiny homes for veterans. The idea is to house 15 to 25 veterans in a village of tiny homes (under 300 square feet, but with all the amenities of a normal home) on one property, with support staff on site. The veterans pay rent based on their income, typically from Veterans Affairs, and get the support to transition back into civilian life, get a full-time job and move into their own more permanent home.

“Our goal is to end the issue of veteran homelessness,” Homes for Heroes co-founder Dave Howard said in an interview Wednesday.

Dave Howard Photo: Screenshot/facebook Credit: Screenshot/facebook

“We have, we believe, over 5,000 veterans experiencing homelessness in any state — and that might be from couch-surfing or living rough to living in the streets — across the country, and we believe we have a solution to eliminate that.”

So far, it’s working.

Less than a year ago, Homes for Heroes opened its first village of tiny homes in Calgary. Now, three tenants have “graduated” from the program.

“We expected the average time for tenants to be in would be a couple of years. There’s no set time for when they need to leave the village. The idea is that they’re ready to go and they’re back on their feet,” Howard said.

“We’re not even a year in and we’ve got three graduates. When I say graduates, it’s vets that came in and they were living hard and rough or on the street, they had some things they needed to work with, but they’ve gotten back on their feet, they’re working full time, they’ve found a permanent residence, they’ve moved out, and now they’re the mentor for the next that’s moved in. We’re thrilled by that.”

YouTube video

Homes for Heroes is waiting on building permits for a village in Edmonton, but the plans are approved, and they’re working with Manitoba and Ontario on sites in those provinces.

“I’ve wanted to be in Halifax since we started,” Howard said.

Coun. Stephen Adams brought a proposal for Halifax to council in January 2019.

“This is a really cool project,” Adams said at that meeting. “And I’m hoping that council can support this and find a way to get it done.”

Adams said there was a developer ready to contribute land and Homes for Heroes was looking to build in 2020. Adams told his fellow councillors there’d be no cost to the municipality, they would just have to zone the land for it.

The motion passed unanimously:

That Halifax Regional Council request a staff report to determine what steps would be necessary to accommodate a program known as Homes for Heroes in the HRM. This program offers housing for homeless vets in small scale development on sites between one half to two acres in size.

Since then, the developer lined up to provide land dropped off — “I don’t know what happened,” Howard said — so Homes for Heroes is now looking for either the municipality or the provincial government to provide the land.

While that’s not nothing, Howard said there’s a good economic argument for supporting his project. Homelessness costs governments about $50,000 per person* annually, according to 2017 research. Howard pegs the number at $80,000.

“We all should care that we have people that defended our country that are living on the street. That’s disgusting. But if we put all that aside, this is a financial issue,” he said. “This is costing so much. And it’s quite an easy fix. We’re coming in with a solution and we’re willing to pay for it.”

The land, ideally about an acre in size, needs to have water and sewer service and be close to transit, ideally in a walkable location, close to grocery stores and other services.

“We don’t want to be downtown,”Howard said. “We’d like to be in a community, if possible. Having our veterans come back and be part of a community is important.”

City contemplating planning changes and new ways of giving land to non-profits

The report from Adams’ January 2019 request came back to council on Tuesday, with a recommendation to direct the chief administrative officer Jacques Dubé to consider developing planning policy to allow “clustered tiny home developments” through multiple ongoing plan reviews, and explore five approaches for “leveraging surplus municipal land for affordable housing.”

On the planning side, the report by planner Jillian MacLellan said every area of Halifax Regional Municipality has different rules when it comes to allowing tiny homes and multiple homes on one property.

“As tiny homes and clustered developments in urban settings are a fairly new concept, existing municipal planning documents generally do not contemplate the use and often pose a barrier to their development,” MacLellan wrote.

In most areas, they’d have to be considered through a development agreement — a time-consuming process.

“Given HRM’s inconsistent planning policy context, and the lengthy application process that the Homes for Heroes Foundation and other interested groups would need to follow, staff advise that there is a need to update the Municipality’s approach to clustered housing throughout the Municipality,” MacLellan wrote.

Hence the first part of the motion, which specifically directs Dubè to “Consider developing planning policies to enable clustered tiny home developments through the Bylaw Simplification program, Regional Plan Review and Land Leased Community By-law review.”

Related: Dartmouth development to include affordable and accessible housing, but it needs help from government

The second part of the motion could have broader implications for the delivery of affordable housing in Halifax.

“To provide affordable housing for veterans, the Homes for Heroes Foundation indicates that it requires land at little or no cost,” MacLellan wrote.

The municipality has an administrative order governing the process of disposing of its own surplus property, which includes the classification of any property being sold into one of six categories: economic development, community interest, ordinary sale, remnant, extraordinary, and intergovernmental transfer.

As presented to council, the recommendation was to consider five approaches “to leveraging surplus municipal land for affordable housing:”

Five common approaches are observed regarding making surplus municipal land available to affordable housing developments:

  1. Ad Hoc: Surplus land is considered for affordable housing on a case-by-case basis. Affordable housing developers/groups may have to compete with other interested parties for land or in some cases Council makes a specific motion that a specific property be used for affordable housing.
  2. Specific Land Category for Affordable Housing: Surplus land is assessed by staff and land that is suitable for affordable housing is put into a specific category. Affordable housing developers/groups would compete amongst each other for available land.
  3. Land Trusts: Surplus land that is suitable for affordable housing is retained in perpetuity and leased to affordable housing groups or individuals. Land trusts are generally formed by non-profits, but there are also a handful of examples of municipally run land trusts.
  4. Land Development Agency: Surplus land suitable for affordable housing is administered by an arm’s length development organization that develops or facilitates the development of affordable housing. Such a group may also facilitate the market sale of a property where the funds are put towards other affordable housing projects.
  5. Housing Corporation: Housing stock including land and buildings is owned and maintained by the Municipality. In this case surplus land that is appropriate for housing could be developed with municipal public housing, which removes pressure from other non-profits and adds to the overall affordable housing stock. A staff report to explore this model was previously requested by Regional Council.

Coun. Shawn Cleary successfully amended the second part of the motion to direct staff to prepare amendments to the administrative order “to establish a specific category for affordable housing,” skipping the consideration step.

Cleary said that while housing is the provincial government’s responsibility, there are things Halifax can do itself.

“We just need to change a few things that we do ourselves, without the province,” he said during Tuesday’s meeting.

“We could, for example, sell land for less than market value to a non-profit or a trust, and we need to explore that. We could, as we’re doing with Bloomfield, where we negotiate different elements for community benefit into a land sale, we could do all those things.”

With that category in place, the municipality could have sold the old St. Pat’s High School site to a non-profit to build affordable housing, rather than selling it at market value (for $37.6 million).

Making land available to non-profits looking to build is “incredible,” Howard said.

“That’s an important step.”

But he also believes tiny homes hold a promise of affordable housing that applies to other models, not just his.

“Our program might be the first, really, of its kind for veterans support. But tiny home communities are quite inexpensive to develop and deploy. We can come into a site, if all approval is done, and within three months, be up. Houses are built in a factory while the site’s being prepped. That’s a three-month process. Very quickly deployed, very inexpensively deployed.”

Howard said seniors and students could benefit from tiny home communities, too.

“Ours, again, is more of a program-based, but there’s other demographics that don’t require that, and just actually getting somebody a roof over their head increases their chances dramatically of being successful in the future and integrating.”

*Update: This article was updated to clarify that the cost is per person.

The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Some people have asked that we additionally allow for one-time donations from readers, so we’ve created that opportunity, via the PayPal button below. We also accept e-transfers, cheques, and donations with your credit card; please contact iris “at” halifaxexaminer “dot” ca for details.

Thank you!

Zane Woodford is the Halifax Examiner’s municipal reporter. He covers Halifax City Hall and contributes to our ongoing PRICED OUT housing series. Twitter @zwoodford

Join the Conversation


Only subscribers to the Halifax Examiner may comment on articles. We moderate all comments. Be respectful; whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims. Please read our Commenting Policy.
    1. I live in the HRM and belong to a small group that is advocating for more tiny homes in our municipal district.

      My advice, start your own group in your area (if possible) and reach out to your municipal and provincial representatives.

      I’m not sure about the policy here on the Halifax Examiner site for providing email addresses and contact information, so I won’t provide any here, not even my own. If it is okay, let me know and I’ll play go-between if you are interested.