The question was straightforward. Would the replacement workers who’d taken their jobs for the previous 19 months continue to work in the newsroom, the Chronicle Herald reporter wanted to know?
There was a long silence. “Yes,” Mark Lever responded finally.
Later, another reporter pressed the newspaper’s CEO. “All of them?”
“All of them.”
It was only their second day back on the job after an incredibly long, deeply bitter and divisive strike, and many among the Halifax Herald’s two dozen remaining reporters and editors already feared management intended to provoke them by forcing them to work alongside ex-scab reporters and editors.
The strike had effectively ended on August 5, 2017, after a furious, 20-hour flurry of compromise and sign-here’s involving Herald management and Halifax Typographical Union negotiators, all under the watchful eye of provincially appointed super-mediator Bill Kaplan.
Union representatives walked away convinced they’d prevailed on one of their final key sticking points — the fate of replacement workers. Except for one strike hire, they understood the replacement workers weren’t coming back.
And yet, on Day 2 of the new post-strike era, some of the returning journalists had come face to face with one of the scab photographers, whom Lever had plucked from mopping floors and made a photojournalist. His presence particularly galled them because Lever had laid off three longtime Herald photo-journalists when the strike ended. They also saw a replacement sports reporter who still seemed to have a job while a fellow veteran union sports reporter had been left out on the street.
The paper’s union reps took their concerns to Mark Lever, who claimed he and his lawyers had come away from the Kaplan discussions with the opposite impression, that management had, in fact, won the unfettered right to continue to employ the strikebreakers.
“We were very firm on that,” he insisted, though later confiding to his returning reporters that the last-minute negotiations were “mind boggling. I mean Kaplan is pretty brilliant, but he didn’t sweat the small stuff.”
The small stuff now threatened to blow the agreement up in everyone’s face. “I’m frustrated,” Lever admitted, “frustrated with this whole fucking process, excuse my language.”
The union reps had invited Lever to meet face-to-face with the newsroom to explain his side. Lever, who said he’d been about to ask their permission to do exactly that, quickly agreed.
Even in the middle of what could have become a disastrous labour u-turn, however, that willingness by both sides to talk offered at least a modest hope.
What followed was a remarkable, and remarkably revealing 50-minute exchange. The discussion was full and frank, but polite. “I appreciate the fact someone didn’t get punched in the face and the police weren’t called,” Lever joked at one point, “so that’s a first step.”
Lever himself was by turns conciliatory (“You are the best. We’re better together”), apologetic (“I know there’s not a lot of trust in the room, and [the issue with replacement workers] makes us look disingenuous, like we’re trying to pull a fast one. So that’s a challenge for me”), self-pitying (“I’m having a hard time getting over some of the stuff that happened”), and even self-deprecating (“I know I’m the owner’s husband and all that stuff”).
At one point, Lever admitted some of his replacement workers had made “egregious mistakes during the strike,” and acknowledged the lack of female and minority journalists in the new Herald newsroom as a “deficiency we need to address.”
But Lever couldn’t help himself. He was also defiant (“If there had been no replacement workers, there would be no business, no place for you to come back to… I know you aren’t [grateful] but you should be. They kept the lights on”) and boastful (“I know no one wants to hear it, but advertisers didn’t leave, at least not many, and we lost fewer subscribers during the strike than in each of the previous five years. We’re way more stable now”).
At one point during the back and forth, Lever declared: “One of the things that changed [during the strike] is that I’m not afraid of you anymore.” He also told them: “We’ve got a contract we’re really happy with,” but then added, almost as an aside: “So how do we show compassion?”
For Lever, that was the conundrum.
On one side were the journalists he’d been at war with for 19 months. They were appalled at the very idea they’d now have to work side-by-side with people who’d not only taken their jobs but also often taunted them in the process. Lever knew he needed the loyalty and support of those professional reporters and editors — even if they were only half their pre-strike numbers — if the paper was to have any hope of restoring its reputation going forward.
On the other hand, Lever also felt personal loyalty to the replacement workers he claimed had “kept the lights on” during the 19 months of the strike. (None of the reporters and editors that day countered with the obvious: if not for the scabs, the strike would not have lasted nearly as long as it did.)
Still, the meeting ended, not with blows or recriminations, but with promises by both sides they would consult with others who’d also been present during those hectic final hours of negotiations — newspaper management and union staff, lawyers, even Kaplan, if necessary — to re-check their memories. If that didn’t resolve the issue, there were always grievances…
That hasn’t turned out to be necessary — at least not yet.
The creation of the Saltwire Network — an internal wire service set up in the middle of the strike after the Herald bought 28 Atlantic Canadian newspapers from Transcontinental Inc.— created a convenient-for-the-Herald legal grey area.
Although the new network and the Herald newsroom share side-by-side space in the same building, Herald management do have the right to hire replacement workers to staff the new network’s newsroom.
The first question — still being negotiated — is to what extent those replacement workers will be allowed to cover stories that would normally be done by Herald journalists. No one yet knows where that line will be. The second, perhaps more important question is how much Herald management wants to taunt its returning journalists by forcing them to work opposite those who helped keep them on the streets for so long.
One hopeful hint is that there appear to be fewer replacement workers than unionized journalists initially feared. Lever said during the meeting with reporters that day that the contracts of at least some of the replacement workers had been allowed to lapse in “anticipation” of the strike’s end.
No one knows, but it is clear the story behind the story of the state — and fate — of the Halifax Herald isn’t over yet.
Thanks for this piece. I am still sulking about the resolution of that strike, and find it tough to read the paper anymore.
Thanks for keeping us in the loop, Stephen. I have no intention of ever writing for the paper again (I stopped when the strike started last year) nor of ever re-subscribing. (I dropped my subscription six or more years ago). I’d sooner put my money towards the Examiner and the Spectator and a few other intelligently written online publications.
I suspect there are many of us holding off on renewing our subscriptions until Mark Lever is out.
Today I was thinking, perhaps I should renew my subscription to the Herald. After reading this, I’m thinking I shall not renew.