• Black Nova Scotia
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Health
    • COVID
  • Investigation
  • Journalism
  • Labour
  • Policing
  • Politics
    • City Hall
    • Elections
    • Province House
  • Profiles
  • Transit
  • Women
  • Morning File
  • Commentary
  • PRICED OUT
  • @Tim_Bousquet
  • Log In

Halifax Examiner

An independent, adversarial news site in Halifax, NS

  • Home
  • About
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Commenting policy
  • Archives
  • Contact us
  • Subscribe
    • Gift Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Swag
  • Receipts
  • Manage your account: update card / change level / cancel
You are here: Home / City Hall / Halifax police board to seek independent legal advice on an ‘occasional ad hoc’ basis

Halifax police board to seek independent legal advice on an ‘occasional ad hoc’ basis

April 19, 2021 By Zane Woodford Leave a Comment

HRM lawyer Katherine Salsman. — Screenshot/YouTube/ZOOM/HRM

The city’s board of police commissioners won’t be getting its own permanent lawyers, but following advice from staff, it will now be able to seek an outside legal opinion when needed.

At its virtual meeting on Monday, the Halifax Board of Police Commissioners discussed a report on whether the city’s legal team is in a conflict of interest when it advises the board.

The report is the result of a motion from Coun. Lindell Smith, now the chair of the board, who asked last year for an outside legal opinion on the issue of a conflict for the municipal legal team. The issue, summarized by the Halifax Examiner here, is that the board is supposed to be independent, yet it gets legal advice from the same people advising the police.

On Monday, city lawyer Katherine Salsman, the author of the report, told the board there’s no legal conflict of interest because the lawyers always act on the municipality’s behalf, not on behalf of the police or any individual employee.

“It would be very rare that there would be a true divergence of interests between HRM itself and the board,” Salsman said, and she said the lawyers would have to recuse themselves if that did happen.

“However, we do recognize that it’s not only important that there be no bias, it’s also important that there be no appearance of bias, and that the board not only has to be independent, it has to appear to be independent to its public. And that means that there may be cases that although there is no true legal conflict of interest, it may appear to the public that there is a perceived conflict of interest caused by having advice being provided by the same lawyers to the board as providing that advice to HRP or to HRM.”

In those cases the board may want to get its own lawyers. Salsman said the Police Act doesn’t bar the board from getting its own legal advice, and she presented two options for the board to do so.

First, the board could stop using HRM lawyers altogether and get its own lawyers for everything, even navigating procedure during meetings. Staff are opposed to this idea.

“It’s likely to cause significant financial waste because it would be an unusual case that there would be a question arise at a meeting unexpectedly that would need to be considered,” Salsman said.

The second option, and Salsman’s preference, is for the board to “access ad hoc legal counsel where required.”

“It could do so by a motion requesting that that independent legal counsel be provided, and then depending on the request, it could be approved by the municipal solicitor, the CAO or council.”

HRM lawyer Marty Ward said the board should be able to get a second legal opinion. But there are “clear advantages” to the current model because the city’s legal staff is well-versed in the procedural rules governing committee meetings.

“We see it as a situation where, you know, the commission should have the option when the commission thinks it’s required, but we don’t think that that’s an every day occurrence,” Ward said.

“We don’t think that’s an every meeting occurrence, but so long as there’s an off-ramp there for the commission, if they need that additional option, that it’s there for them.”

Coun. Becky Kent said she felt it was the most “fiscally responsible” choice. Coun. Lisa Blackburn and Commissioner Carole McDougall agreed.

Smith asked the lawyers whether the board should have an increased budget to pay for any necessary outside legal costs. Ward said he thinks the commission should just ask chief administrative officer Jacques Dubé for the money on a case-by-case basis, and Dubé will arrange for it.

The motion — endorsing the “use of occasional ad hoc legal advice as required” — passed unanimously.


The Halifax Examiner is an advertising-free, subscriber-supported news site. Your subscription makes this work possible; please subscribe.

Some people have asked that we additionally allow for one-time donations from readers, so we’ve created that opportunity, via the PayPal button below. We also accept e-transfers, cheques, and donations with your credit card; please contact iris “at” halifaxexaminer “dot” ca for details.

Thank you!




Filed Under: City Hall, Featured, News

About Zane Woodford

Zane Woodford covers municipal politics for the Halifax Examiner. Email: [email protected]; Twitter

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

PRICED OUT

A collage of various housing options in HRM, including co-ops, apartment buildings, shelters, and tents
PRICED OUT is the Examiner’s investigative reporting project focused on the housing crisis.

You can learn about the project, including how we’re asking readers to direct our reporting, our published articles, and what we’re working on, on the PRICED OUT homepage.

2020 mass murders

Nine images illustrating the locations, maps, and memorials of the mass shootings

All of the Halifax Examiner’s reporting on the mass murders of April 18/19, 2020, and recent articles on the Mass Casualty Commission and newly-released documents.

Updated regularly.

Uncover: Dead Wrong

In 1995, Brenda Way was brutally murdered behind a Dartmouth apartment building. In 1999, Glen Assoun was found guilty of the murder. He served 17 years in prison, but steadfastly maintained his innocence. In 2019, Glen Assoun was fully exonerated.

Halifax Examiner founder and investigative journalist Tim Bousquet has followed the story of Glen Assoun's wrongful conviction for over five years. Now, Bousquet tells that story as host of Season 7 of the CBC podcast series Uncover: Dead Wrong.

Click here to go to listen to the podcast, or search for CBC Uncover on Apple podcasts, Spotify, or any other podcast aggregator.

The Tideline, with Tara Thorne

Two young white women, one with dark hair and one blonde, smile at the camera on a sunny spring day.

Episode 79 of The Tideline, with Tara Thorne, is published.

Grace McNutt and Linnea Swinimer are the Minute Women, two Haligonians who host a podcast of the same name about Canadian history as seen through a lens of Heritage Minutes (minutewomenpodcast.ca). In a lively celebration of the show’s second birthday, they stop by to reveal how curling brought them together in podcast — and now BFF — form, their favourite Minutes, that time they thought Jean Chretien was dead, and the impact their show has had. Plus music from brand-new ECMA winners Hillsburn and Zamani.

Listen to the episode here.

Check out some of the past episodes here.

Subscribe to the podcast to get episodes automatically downloaded to your device — there’s a great instructional article here. Email Suzanne for help.

You can reach Tara here.

Sign up for email notification

Sign up to receive email notification when we publish new Morning Files and Weekend Files. Note: signing up for this email is NOT the same as subscribing to the Halifax Examiner. To subscribe, click here.

Recent posts

  • Weekend File May 21, 2022
  • Last week tied the record for weekly COVID deaths in Nova Scotia May 20, 2022
  • National study to assess pandemic’s health impacts, potential long-term effects of COVID-19 May 19, 2022
  • NSTU president concerned about conflict as province announces end to mask mandate in schools May 19, 2022
  • Royal flush: the monarchy’s role in reconciliation and Canada today May 19, 2022

Commenting policy

All comments on the Halifax Examiner are subject to our commenting policy. You can view our commenting policy here.

Copyright © 2022